<em>&alpha;</em> decay properties of <sup>297</sup>Og within the two-potential approach

Jun-Gang Deng; Jun-Hao Cheng; Bo Zheng; Xiao-Hua Li

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124109

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(12) : 124109 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124109

α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach

Jun-Gang Deng ¹ ,
Jun-Hao Cheng ¹ ,
Bo Zheng ^1,, ,
Xiao-Hua Li ^1,2,3,,

1.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
2.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
3.
Cooperative Innovation Center for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technology &
4.
Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The α decay half-life of the unknown nucleus ²⁹⁷Og is predicted within the two-potential approach, and α preformation probabilities of 64 odd-A nuclei in the region of proton numbers 82 < Z < 126 and neutron numbers 152 < N < 184, from ²⁵¹Cf to ²⁹⁵Og, are extracted. In addition, based on the latest experimental data, a new set of parameters for α preformation probabilities considering the shell effect and proton-neutron interaction are obtained. The predicted α decay half-life of ²⁹⁷Og is 0.16 ms within a factor of 4.97. The predicted spin and parity of the ground states for ²⁶⁹Sg, ²⁸⁵Fl and ²⁹³Lv are 3/2⁺, 3/2⁺ and 5/2⁺, respectively.
- decay ,
- 297Og ,
- preformation probability ,
- two-potential approach

References

[1]	S. Hofmann and G. Mnzenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys., 72:733-767(2000)
[2]	S. Hofmann, Radiochim. Acta, 99:405-428
[3]	Y. T. Oganessian and K. P. Rykaczewski, Phys. Today, 68:32-38(2015)
[4]	Y. T. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Y. V. Lobanov, F. S. Abdullin et al, Phys. Rev. C, 76:011601(2007)
[5]	E. Peik and Z. Kai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:044602(2006)
[6]	Y. Oganessian, J. Phys. G, 34:R165(2007)
[7]	Y. T. Oganessian, F. S. Abdullin, P. D. Bailey, D. E. Benker et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:142502(2010)
[8]	P. A. Ellison, K. E. Gregorich, J. S. Berryman et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:182701(2010)
[9]	S. Hofmann, S. Heinz, R. Mann, J. Maurer et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 48:62(2012)
[10]	A. Sobiczewski, F. Gareev, and B. Kalinkin, Phys. Lett., 22:500-502(1962)
[11]	U. Mosel and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. A, 222:261-282(1969)
[12]	K. P. Santhosh and C. Nithya, Phys. Rev. C, 94:054621(2016)
[13]	X. J. Bao, S. Q. Guo, H. F. Zhang, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:034323(2017)
[14]	K. Varga, R. G. Lovas, and R. J. Liotta, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:37-40(1992)
[15]	B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, Phys. Rev. C, 51:559-565(1995)
[16]	G. Royer, J. Phys. G, 26:1149(2000)
[17]	P. Mohr, Phys. Rev. C, 73:031301(2006)
[18]	C. Xu and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 74:014304(2006)
[19]	D. N. Poenaru, I.-H. Plonski, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C, 74:014312(2006)
[20]	C. Qi, F. R. Xu, R. J. Liotta, and R. Wyss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:072501(2009)
[21]	H. F. Zhang and G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C, 77:054318(2008)
[22]	D. Ni and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 81:064318(2010)
[23]	X. Bao, H. Zhang, H. Zhang et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 921:85-95(2014)
[24]	S. A. Gurvitz and G. Kalbermann, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59:262-265(1987)
[25]	S. A. Gurvitz, P. B. Semmes, W. Nazarewicz, and T. Vertse, Phys. Rev. A, 69:042705(2004)
[26]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 85:027306(2012)
[27]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 852:82-91(2011)
[28]	Y. Qian, Z. Ren, and D. Ni, Nucl. Phys. A, 866:1-15(2011)
[29]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034316(2016)
[30]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 94:024338(2016)
[31]	X.-D. Sun, J.-G. Deng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:044303(2017)
[32]	X.-D. Sun, C. Duan, J.-G. Deng, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:014319(2017)
[33]	X.-D. Sun, X.-J. Wu, B. Zheng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Chin. Phys. C, 41:014102(217)
[34]	P. Mller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 59:185-381(1995)
[35]	J. Duflo and A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C, 52:R23-R27(1995)
[36]	R. C. Nayak and L. Satpathy, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 98:616-719(2012)
[37]	N. Wang and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. C, 84:051303(R) (2011)
[38]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C, 93:014302(2016)
[39]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Lett. B, 734:215-219(2014)
[40]	I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 32:691(2001)
[41]	A. Sobiczewski and K. Pomorski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 58:292-349(2007)
[42]	A. N. Kuzmina, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C, 85:014139(2012)
[43]	S. Goriely, N. Chamel, and J. M. Pearson, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034337(2016)
[44]	S. Liran, A. Marinov, and N. Zeldes, Phys. Rev. C, 62:047301(2000)
[45]	A. Sobiczewski, J. Phys. G, 43:095106(2016)
[46]	A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C, 94:051302(R) (2016)
[47]	G. Audi, F. Kondev, M.Wang, W. Huang, and S. Naimi, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030001(2017)
[48]	W.J. Huang, G. Audi, M.Wang, F. Kondev, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030002(2017)
[49]	M.Wang, G. Audi, F. Kondev, W.J. Huang, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030003(2017)
[50]	A. Zdeb, M. Warda, and K. Pomorski, Phys. Rev. C, 87:024308(2013)
[51]	B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65:2975-2977(1990)
[52]	J. J. Morehead, J. Math. Phys., 36:5431-5452(1995)
[53]	V. Y. Denisov and A. A. Khudenko, Phys. Rev. C, 79:054614(2009)
[54]	C. Qi, Rev. Phys., 1:77-89(2016)
[55]	W. M. Seif, M. M. Botros, and A. I. Refaie, Phys. Rev. C, 92:044302(2015)
[56]	C. Xu, Z. Ren, G. Rpke, P. Schuck, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, A. Tohsaki, T. Yamada, and B. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C, 93:011306(R) (2016)
[57]	C. Xu, G. Rpke, P. Schuck, Z. Ren, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, A. Tohsaki, T. Yamada, and B. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C, 95:061306(R) (2017)
[58]	C. Xu and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 760:303-316(2005)
[59]	H. F. Zhang, G. Royer, Y. J. Wang, J. M. Dong, W. Zuo, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 80:057301(2009)
[60]	S. Guo, X. Bao, Y. Gao, J. Li, and H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. A, 934:110-120(2015)

[1]	Yiling Xie , Hao Sun . Strong decay of $ { \boldsymbol Y({\bf{4230}}){\bf\to}\boldsymbol J/\boldsymbol\psi \boldsymbol f_{\bf 0}({\bf{980}}) }$ in light cone sum rules. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(2): 023105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad13f9
[2]	Nitin Sharma , Ashutosh Kaushik , Manoj K. Sharma . Sequential decay analysis of ²³⁵U(n^th, f ) reaction using fragmentation approach. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(6): 064104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad2dc1
[3]	Joshua T. Majekodunmi , M. Bhuyan , K. Anwar , N. Abdullah , Raj Kumar . Preformation probability and kinematics of cluster emission yielding Pb-daughters. Chinese Physics C, 2023, 47(7): 074106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acbf2b
[4]	Xiao Pan , You-Tian Zou , Hong-Ming Liu , Biao He , Xiao-Hua Li , Xi-Jun Wu , Zhen Zhang . Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives using the two-potential and Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approaches. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac2421
[5]	Yan-Wei Zhao , Shu-Qing Guo , Hong-Fei Zhang . α particle preformation and shell effect for heavy andsuperheavy nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(7): 074103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/7/074103
[6]	Virendrasinh Kher , Ajay Kumar Rai . Spectroscopy and decay properties of charmonium. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/8/083101
[7]	Jing Zhang , De-Jun E , Hong-Fei Zhang . Effects of shell correction on α decay properties. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 094101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/094101
[8]	Jun-Gang Deng , Jie-Cheng Zhao , Jiu-Long Chen , Xi-Jun Wu , Xiao-Hua Li . α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(4): 044102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102
[9]	Xiao-Dong Sun , Xi-Jun Wu , Bo Zheng , Dong Xiang , Ping Guo , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α preformation probability of nuclear isomeric and ground states. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(1): 014102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/014102
[10]	Smruti Patel , P. C. Vinodkumar , Shashank Bhatnagar . Decay rates of charmonia within a quark-antiquark confining potential. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 053102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/053102
[11]	HUANG Xiao-Long , JIANG Li-Yang , CHEN Xiong-Jun , CHEN Guo-Chang . Evaluation of the 1077 keV γ-ray emission probability from ⁶⁸Ga decay. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(4): 044001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/4/044001
[12]	E. Javadimanesh , S. Zarrinkamar , H. Rahimov . An angle-dependent potential and alpha-decay half-lives ofdeformed nuclei for 67≤Z≤91. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(4): 044101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/4/044101
[13]	ZHOU Zhi-Yong , WANG Qi-Chao , GAO Qing . Investigation of the rescattering effect in D decay. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(8): 708-712. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/8/002
[14]	LI Bai-Qing , LI Rong , HE Zhi-Guo . η_b decay into charmonium in association with cc pair. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(5): 521-527. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/001
[15]	LIU Wei-Wei , LUO Zhi-Quan , ZHANG Jie , GAO Jie , BIAN Gang . Influence of super-strong magnetic field on the electron chemical potential and β decay in the stellar surroundings. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(8): 1090-1093. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/8/010
[16]	P. C. Vinodkumar . Decay properties of D and D_s mesons in coulomb plus power potential (CPP_ν). Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1497-1499. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/083
[17]	ZHONG Bin , PING Rong-Gang , XIAO Zhen-Jun . Study of Λ decay parameter in J/ψ→ΛΛ decay. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(9): 692-696. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/9/003
[18]	Zhang Li , Jin Genming , Zhao Jinhua , Yang Weifan , Yang Yongfeng , Zhao Zhizheng , Zheng Jiwen , Sun Xiurong , Wang Jicheng , Li Zongwei , Qin Zhi , Guo Guanghui . Identification of ²⁰⁸Hg. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(Z1): 1-8.
[19]	Zhang Tianbao , Yang Guangming , Guo Baonian , Wang Haidong . Experimental Investigation of the Decay Rate of Orthopositronium. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S2): 135-140.
[20]	Fan Wo , Zhao Zhizheng , Sun Xiuron , Mu Wantong , Ma Jiayu , Yang Weifan , Xie Xiujun , Zhao Lili , Yu Jusheng . The ⁷³Br Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(S2): 199-208.

Access

Get Citation

Jun-Gang Deng, Jun-Hao Cheng, Bo Zheng and Xiao-Hua Li. α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(12): 124109. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124109

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-07-15
Revised: 2017-09-19

Fund

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11205083, 11505100), Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province, the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (15A159), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2015JJ3103, 2015JJ2121), the Innovation Group of Nuclear and Particle Physics in USC, the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2015AQ007) and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate (CX2017B536)

Article Metric

Article Views(1662)
PDF Downloads(46)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Bo Zheng,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of 297Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

α decay properties of 297Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Bo Zheng,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach

α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach