Spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with hyperfine interaction

Zhen-Yang Wang; Jing-Juan Qi; Xin-Heng Guo; Ke-Wei Wei

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/9/093103

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(9) : 093103 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/9/093103

Spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with hyperfine interaction

Zhen-Yang Wang ^1,, ,
Jing-Juan Qi ^1,, ,
Xin-Heng Guo ^1,, ,
Ke-Wei Wei ^2,,

1.
College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2.
College of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Up to now, the excited charmed and bottom baryon states have still not been well studied experimentally or theoretically. In this paper, we predict the mass of Ω_b^*, the only L=0 baryon state which has not been observed, to be 6069.2 MeV. The spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with the orbital angular momentum L=1 are studied in two popular constituent quark models, the Goldstone boson exchange (GBE) model and the one gluon exchange (OGE) hyperfine interaction model. Inserting the latest experimental data from the "Review of Particle Physics", we find that in the GBE model, there exist some multiplets (∑_c(b), Ξ'_c(b) and Ω_c(b)) in which the total spin of the three quarks in their lowest energy states is 3/2, but in the OGE model there is no such phenomenon. This is the most important difference between the GBE and OGE models. These results can be tested in the near future. We suggest more efforts to study the excited charmed and bottom baryons both theoretically and experimentally, not only for the abundance of baryon spectra, but also for determining which hyperfine interaction model best describes nature.
- charmed baryons ,
- bottom baryons ,
- mass spectra ,
- fine and hyperfine structure

References

[1]	L. A. Copley, N. Isgur, and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D, 20:768(1979)
[2]	L. Y. Glozman and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rept., 268:263(1996)
[3]	L. Y. Glozman and D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A, 603:326(1996)
[4]	N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D, 19:2653(1979)
[5]	N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D, 18:4187(1978)
[6]	K. Maltman and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D, 22:1701(1980)
[7]	N. Mathur, Y. Chen, S. J. Dong, T. Draper, I. Horvath, F. X. Lee, K. F. Liu, and J. B. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B, 605:137(2005)
[8]	K. A. Olive et al (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C, 38:090001(2014)
[9]	R. Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:172003(2012)
[10]	R. Aaij et al (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 114:062004(2015)
[11]	R. Mizuk et al (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:122002(2005)
[12]	B. Aubert et al (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 78:112003(2008)
[13]	A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D, 12:147(1975)
[14]	S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D, 32:189(1985)
[15]	J. Q. Chen, Group Representation Theory for Physicists, (Singapore:World Scientific, 1989)
[16]	Zhong-Qi Ma, Group Theory in Physics (in Chinese) (Beijing:Science Press, 1998)
[17]	F. E. Close, An Introduction to Quarks and Partons, (New York:Academic Press 1979)
[18]	N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Lett. B 72:109(1977)
[19]	N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D, 20:1191(1979)
[20]	S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45:S241(2000)
[21]	V. Borka Jovanovic, S. R. Ignjatovic, D. Borka, and P. Jovanovic, Phys. Rev. D, 82:117501(2010)
[22]	F. Buisseret, N. Matagne, and C. Semay, Phys. Rev. D, 85:036010(2012)
[23]	S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D, 34:2809(1986)
[24]	V. Borka Jovanovic and D. Borka, Rom. J. Phys., 57:803(2012)
[25]	M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D, 90(9):094007(2014)
[26]	D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D, 84:014025(2011)
[27]	Z. Shah, K. Thakkar, A. Kumar Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Eur. Phys. J. A, 52(10):313(2016)
[28]	Z. Shah, K. Thakkar, A. K. Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Chin. Phys. C, 40(12):123102(2016)
[29]	K. L. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, arXiv:1703.09130[hep-ph]
[30]	B. Chen and X. Liu, arXiv:1704.02583[hep-ph]

[1]	Yong Zheng , Jian-Nan Ding , Dong-Hao Li , Lei-Yi Li , Cai-Dian Lü , Fu-Sheng Yu . Invisible and semi-invisible decays of bottom baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(8): 083109. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad4afa
[2]	Zhen-Yu Li , Guo-Liang Yu , Zhi-Gang Wang , Jian-Zhong Gu , Jie Lu , Hong-Tao Shen . Systematic analysis of strange single heavy baryons ${ \boldsymbol\Xi_{\boldsymbol c} }$ and ${\boldsymbol\Xi_{\boldsymbol b} }$. Chinese Physics C, 2023, 47(7): 073105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acd365
[3]	Jia-Jie Han , Hua-Yu Jiang , Wei Liu , Zhen-Jun Xiao , Fu-Sheng Yu . Rescattering mechanism of weak decays of double-charm baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(5): 053105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abec68
[4]	Chandni Menapara , Ajay Kumar Rai . Spectroscopic investigation of light strange S = −1 Λ and Σ and S = −2 Ξ baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(6): 063108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abf4f4
[5]	Chandni Menapara , Zalak Shah , Ajay Kumar Rai . Spectroscopic properties of Δ baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(2): 023102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abcc58
[6]	Qiang Li , Chao-Hsi Chang , Si-Xue Qin , Guo-Li Wang . Mass spectra and wave functions of the doubly heavy baryons with J^P=1⁺ heavy diquark cores. Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(1): 013102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/1/013102
[7]	Zhen-Xing Zhao . Weak decays of heavy baryons in the light-front approach. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 093101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/093101
[8]	Fu-Sheng Yu , Hua-Yu Jiang , Run-Hui Li , Cai-Dian Lü , Wei Wang , Zhen-Xing Zhao . Discovery potentials of doubly charmed baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(5): 051001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/5/051001
[9]	Jian Liang , Wei Sun , Ying Chen , Wei-Feng Qiu , Ming Gong , Chuan Liu , Yu-Bin Liu , Zhao-Feng Liu , Jian-Ping Ma , Jian-Bo Zhang . Spectrum and Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes of Ω baryons from lattice QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(4): 041001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/4/041001
[10]	Zalak Shah , Kaushal Thakkar , Ajay Kumar Rai , P. C. Vinodkumar . Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of Λ_c⁺, Σ_c⁰, Ξ_c⁰ and Ω_c⁰ baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(12): 123102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123102
[11]	XIE Wei , WANG Ping . Unified Hamiltonian model for mesons and baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(5): 053102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/5/053102
[12]	MU Chun , WANG Xiao , CHEN Xiao-Lin , LIU Xiang , ZHU Shi-Lin . Dipion decays of heavy baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(11): 113101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/11/113101
[13]	H. Hassanabadi , A. A. Rajabi . Ground states and excitation spectra of baryons in a non-relativistic model with the anharmonic potential. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(11): 113101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/11/113101
[14]	CAO Lu , WANG Biao , CHEN Hong . Strange magnetic moments of octet baryons under SU(3) breaking. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(5): 390-394. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/5/002
[15]	YANG Zhong-Cheng , SUN Zhi-Feng , HE Jun , LIU Xiang , ZHU Shi-Lin . Possible hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of an anti-charmed meson and a charmed baryon. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(1): 6-13. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/1/002
[16]	B. Patel , P. C. Vinodkumar . Quark-diquark model description for double charm baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1399-1401. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/053
[17]	D. O. Riska . Five-quark components in baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1201-1204. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/010
[18]	M. Karliner . Spectrum of b-baryons: color hyperfine interaction vs. experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1191-1194. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/008
[19]	E. Hernandez , J. Nieves . Role of hyperfine mixing in b→c semileptonic decays of doubly-heavy baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1488-1490. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/080
[20]	CHEN Bing , WANG Deng-Xia , ZHANG Ai-Lin . J^P assignments of Λ_c⁺ baryons. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1327-1330. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/047

Access

Get Citation

Zhen-Yang Wang, Jing-Juan Qi, Xin-Heng Guo and Ke-Wei Wei. Spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with hyperfine interaction[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(9): 093103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/9/093103

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-02-10
Revised: 2017-05-12

Fund

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11175020, 11575023, U1204115)

Article Metric

Article Views(1643)
PDF Downloads(28)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with hyperfine interaction

Corresponding author: Zhen-Yang Wang,

Corresponding author: Jing-Juan Qi,

Corresponding author: Xin-Heng Guo,

Corresponding author: Ke-Wei Wei,

1. College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

2. College of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China

Received Date: 2017-02-10

Accepted Date: 2017-05-12

Available Online: 2017-09-05

Fund Project: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11175020, 11575023, U1204115)

Abstract: Up to now, the excited charmed and bottom baryon states have still not been well studied experimentally or theoretically. In this paper, we predict the mass of Ω_b^*, the only L=0 baryon state which has not been observed, to be 6069.2 MeV. The spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with the orbital angular momentum L=1 are studied in two popular constituent quark models, the Goldstone boson exchange (GBE) model and the one gluon exchange (OGE) hyperfine interaction model. Inserting the latest experimental data from the "Review of Particle Physics", we find that in the GBE model, there exist some multiplets (∑_c(b), Ξ'_c(b) and Ω_c(b)) in which the total spin of the three quarks in their lowest energy states is 3/2, but in the OGE model there is no such phenomenon. This is the most important difference between the GBE and OGE models. These results can be tested in the near future. We suggest more efforts to study the excited charmed and bottom baryons both theoretically and experimentally, not only for the abundance of baryon spectra, but also for determining which hyperfine interaction model best describes nature.

HTML

Reference (30)

Spectra of charmed and bottom baryons with hyperfine interaction

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article