An updated study of Y production and polarizationat the Tevatron and LHC

FENG Yu; GONG Bin; WAN Lu-Ping; WANG Jian-Xiong

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/12/123102

Chinese Physics C> 2015, Vol. 39> Issue(12) : 123102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/12/123102

An updated study of Y production and polarizationat the Tevatron and LHC

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 918(4), Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Following the nonrelativistic QCD factorization scheme, by taking the latest available measurements of χ_bJ(3P) into consideration, we present an updated study on the yield and polarization of Y(1S, 2S, 3S) hadroproduction, and the fractions of χ_bJ(mP) feed-down in Y(nS) production at QCD next-to-leading order. In the fitting, three schemes are applied with different choices of χ_bJ(mP) feed-down ratios and NRQCD factorization scale. The results can explain the measurements of yield very well. The polarization puzzle to (3S) is now solved by considering the χ_bJ(3P) feed-down contributions. The ratio of σ[χ_b2(1P)]/σ[χ_b1(1P)] measured by the CMS experiment can also be reproduced in our prediction. Among the different schemes, the results show little difference, but there are sizeable differences for the fitted long-distance color-octet matrix elements. This may bring large uncertainties when the values are applied in theoretical predictions for other experiments such as those at ee, ep colliders.
- non-relativistic quantum chromodynamics ,
- next-to-leading order ,
- Y ,
- bJ feed-down contributions ,
- polarization

References

[1]	Braaten E, Fleming S. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1995, 74: 3327-3330
[2]	Bodwin G T, Braaten E, Lepage G P. Phys. Rev. D, 1995, 51: 1125-1171
[3]	Campbell J M, Maltoni F, Tramontano F. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98: 252002
[4]	GONG Bin, WANG Jian-Xiong. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100: 232001
[5]	KANG Zhong-Bo, QIU Jian-Wei, Sterman G. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 102002
[6]	GONG Bin, LI Xue-Qian, WANG Jian-Xiong. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 673: 197-200
[7]	MA Yan-Qing, WANG Kai, CHAO Kuang-Ta. Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 83: 111503
[8]	Butenschoen M, Kniehl B A. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 172002
[9]	CHAO Kuang-Ta, MA Yan-Qing, SHAO Hua-Sheng et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 242004
[10]	GONG Bin, WAN Lu-Ping, WANG Jian-Xiong et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110: 042002
[11]	Aaij R et al. (LHCb collaboration). arXiv: 1409.3612
[12]	Butenschoen M, HE Zhi-Guo, Kniehl B A. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 114: 092004
[13]	HAN Hao, MA Yan-Qing, MENG Ce et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 114: 092005
[14]	ZHANG Hong-Fei, SUN Zhan, SANG Wen-Long et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 114: 092006
[15]	GONG Bin, WANG Jian-Xiong, ZHANG Hong-Fei. Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 83: 114021
[16]	WANG Kai, MA Yan-Qing, CHAO Kuang-Ta. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 114003
[17]	GONG Bin, WAN Lu-Ping, WANG Jian-Xiong et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 112(3): 032001
[18]	Aaij R et al. (LHCb collaboration). JHEP, 2014, 1410: 88
[19]	Aaij R et al. (LHCb collaboration). Eur. Phys. J. C, 2014, 74(10): 3092
[20]	Khachatryan V et al. (CMS collaboration). arXiv: 1409. 5761
[21]	Beneke M, Kramer M, Vanttinen M. Phys. Rev. D, 1998, 57: 4258-4274
[22]	WANG Jian-Xiong. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2004, 534: 241-245
[23]	WAN Lu-Ping, WANG Jian-Xiong. Comput. Phys. Commun, 2014, 185: 2939-2949
[24]	Pumplin J, Stump D R, Huston J et al. JHEP, 2002, 0207: 012
[25]	Beringer J et al. (Particle Data Group collaboration). Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 86: 010001
[26]	Eichten E J, Quigg C. Phys. Rev. D, 1995, 52: 1726-1728
[27]	Acosta D et al. (CDF collaboration). Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 88: 161802
[28]	Aaij R et al. (LHCb collaboration). Eur. Phys. J. C, 2012, 72: 2025
[29]	Khachatryan V et al. (CMS collaboration). Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 83: 112004
[30]	Aad G et al. (ATLAS collaboration). Phys. Rev. D, 2013, 87(5): 052004
[31]	Aaltonen T et al. (CDF collaboration). Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 151802
[32]	Chatrchyan S et al. (CMS collaboration). Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110(8): 081802
[33]	HAN Hao, MA Yan-Qing, MENG Ce et al. arXiv:1410.8537
[34]	WANG Jian-Xiong, ZHANG Hong-Fei. J. Phys. G, 2015, 42(2): 025004
[35]	JIA Lan, YU Ling, ZHANG Hong-Fei. arXiv: 1410.4032

[1]	Yong-Qing Chen , Peng-Cheng Hong , Zhuo Chen , Wei Shan , Wei-Min Song . Polarization study of P-wave charmonium radiative decay into a light vector meson at e⁺e⁻ collider experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(1): 013002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad8ba2
[2]	Li-Ping Sun . J/ψ pair hadroproduction at next-to-leading order in nonrelativistic-QCD at ATLAS. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(3): 033102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad1a98
[3]	Li-Ping Sun . J/ψ pair hadroproduction at next-to-leading order in nonrelativistic-QCD at CMS. Chinese Physics C, 2023, 47(9): 093105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ace521
[4]	Zuo-Tang Liang , Jun Song , Isaac Upsal , Qun Wang , Zhangbu Xu . Rapidity dependence of global polarization in heavy ion collisions. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(1): 014102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abc065
[5]	Yu Feng , Bin Gong , Chao-Hsi Chang , Jian-Xiong Wang . Complete study on polarization of $ {\Upsilon {(nS)}}$ hadroproduction at QCD next-to-leading order. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(1): 013117. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abc682
[6]	V. R. Debastiani;F S. Navarra . A non-relativistic model for the ${[cc][\bar{c}\bar{c}]}$ tetraquark. Chinese Physics C, 2019, df87c41e-622f-49a7-b081-5c584df157aa(11): 13105-.
[7]	Kai-Wen Li , Xiu-Lei Ren , Li-Sheng Geng , Bing-Wei Long . Leading order relativistic hyperon-nucleon interactions in chiral effective field theory. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(1): 014105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/1/014105
[8]	Pazilet Obul , Sayipjamal Dulat , Tie-Jiun Hou , Ablikim Tursun , Nijat Yalkun . Next-to-leading order QCD and electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung processes at the LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 093105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/093105
[9]	Qing-Feng Sun , An-Min Wang . Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the decay of Higgs to vector meson and Z boson. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(3): 033105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/3/033105
[10]	Xiu-Lei Ren , Kai-Wen Li , Li-Sheng Geng , Bingwei Long , Peter Ring , Jie Meng . Leading order relativistic chiral nucleon-nucleon interaction. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(1): 014103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/1/014103
[11]	Yu. A. Berezhnoy , V. P. Mikhailyuk . Polarization of protons in the optical model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(2): 024102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/024102
[12]	Hai-Nan Lin , Xin Li , Zhe Chang . Polarization of gamma-ray burst afterglows in the synchrotron self-Compton process from a highly relativistic jet. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(4): 045101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/045101
[13]	Chao Zhou , Mao Song , Gang Li , Ya-Jin Zhou , Jian-You Guo . Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Higgs boson decay to quarkonium plus a photon. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(12): 123105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/12/123105
[14]	HE Yun-Cun , ZHANG Ben-Wei , WANG En-Ke . Jet production at next-to-leading order in p+Au collisions at the RHIC. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(11): 1077-1081. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/11/007
[15]	CHU Shao-Xia , HOU De-Fu , REN Hai-Cang . On the Next-leading order Heavy-Quark Potential from AdS/CFT. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1355-1359. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/041
[16]	E. Prencipe . X Y Z particles at BABAR. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 644-649. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/006
[17]	LI Hsiang-Nan . Next-to-leading-order calculation in k_T factorization. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(6): 463-468. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/6/012
[18]	Deng Jingkang , Shang Rencheng , Zhu Shengjiang , Xu Wang , Zhang Juping , Jin Qingzhen , Zhu Henian , Xia Shaojian , Yan Yonglian , Guo Yanan . Study on Beam Polarization and the Design of a Polarimeter in BEPC. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S3): 85-93.
[19]	Shen Qixing , Yu Hong . The Polarization States of the Gluon and the Glueball Interpretation of the ξ (2230). Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(S2): 153-157.
[20]	Ge Liangxiao , Zhuo Yizhong . Non-Relativistic BUU Equation. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S3): 289-302.

Access

Get Citation

FENG Yu, GONG Bin, WAN Lu-Ping and WANG Jian-Xiong. An updated study of Y production and polarizationat the Tevatron and LHC[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(12): 123102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/12/123102

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2015-03-31
Revised: 2015-07-08

Fund

Supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (11475183) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2014010)

Article Metric

Article Views(1565)
PDF Downloads(46)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

An updated study of Y production and polarizationat the Tevatron and LHC

Corresponding author: FENG Yu,

Corresponding author: GONG Bin,

Corresponding author: WAN Lu-Ping,

Corresponding author: WANG Jian-Xiong,

1. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 918(4), Beijing 100049, China

Received Date: 2015-03-31

Accepted Date: 2015-07-08

Available Online: 2015-12-20

Fund Project: Supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (11475183) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2014010)

Abstract: Following the nonrelativistic QCD factorization scheme, by taking the latest available measurements of χ_bJ(3P) into consideration, we present an updated study on the yield and polarization of Y(1S, 2S, 3S) hadroproduction, and the fractions of χ_bJ(mP) feed-down in Y(nS) production at QCD next-to-leading order. In the fitting, three schemes are applied with different choices of χ_bJ(mP) feed-down ratios and NRQCD factorization scale. The results can explain the measurements of yield very well. The polarization puzzle to (3S) is now solved by considering the χ_bJ(3P) feed-down contributions. The ratio of σ[χ_b2(1P)]/σ[χ_b1(1P)] measured by the CMS experiment can also be reproduced in our prediction. Among the different schemes, the results show little difference, but there are sizeable differences for the fitted long-distance color-octet matrix elements. This may bring large uncertainties when the values are applied in theoretical predictions for other experiments such as those at ee, ep colliders.

HTML

Reference (35)

An updated study of Y production and polarizationat the Tevatron and LHC

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article