Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness

S. A. Alavi; V. Dehghani

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064104

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(6) : 064104 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064104

Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness

S. A. Alavi ^, ,
V. Dehghani ^,

1.
Department of Physics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan 98135-674, Iran

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Alpha-induced reactions on ¹⁵⁴Sm, ^{233,235,236,238}U, and ²³⁷Np deformed nuclei are studied theoretically. The effects of hexadecapole deformation, deformed surface diffuseness parameter, and orientation on barrier height and position, fusion cross-section at any angle, and fusion cross-section have been investigated. Both hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness can affect barrier characteristics and enhance fusion cross-section. Good agreement between experimental data and theoretical calculations with quadrupole and hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness were observed for the ⁴He+¹⁵⁴Sm, ²³⁵U, ²³⁷Np reactions.
- nuclear potential ,
- fusion cross section ,
- deformation ,
- alpha induced reaction.

References

[1]	Wayne Swenson, Nikola Cindro, Phys. Rev., 123: 910 (1961)
[2]	S. J. Iwata, J. Phys. Soc. Japan., 17: 1323 (1962); S. Tanaka, M. Furukawa, T. Mikumo, S. Iwata, M. Yagi and H. Amano, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 15: 952 (1960)
[3]	P. Mohr, Eur. Phys. J. A, 51.5: 1 (2015)
[4]	G. G. Kiss et al, Phys. Lett. B, 735 : 40 (2014)
[5]	V. Yu. Denisov, Phys. Lett. B, 526: 315 (2002)
[6]	Ning Wang et al, Phys. Rev. C, 74: 044604 (2006)
[7]	J. Blocki et al, Ann. Phys. (NY), 105: 427 (1977)
[8]	P. Mller and J. R. Nix., Nucl. Phys. A, 361: 117 (1981)
[9]	W. Reisdorf, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 20: 1297 (1994)
[10]	W. D. Myers and W. J. Sowiatecki, Phys. Rev. C, 62: 044610 (2000)
[11]	R. Bass, Phys. Rev. Lett., 39: 265 (1977)
[12]	P. R. Christensen and A. Winther, Phys. Lett. B, 65: 19 (1976)
[13]	D. Jain, R. Kumar, and M. K. Sharma, Nucl. Phys. A, 915: 106 (2013)
[14]	J. O. Fernandez Niello and C. H. Dasso, Phys. Rev. C, 39: 2069 (1989)
[15]	M. J. Rhoades-Brown and V. E. Oberacker, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50: 1435 (1983)
[16]	R. C. Lemmon et al, Phys. Lett. B, 316: 32 (1993)
[17]	T. Rajbongshi et al, Phys. Rev. C, 93: 054622 (2016)
[18]	X. J. Bao et al, J. Phys. G : Nucl. Part. Phys., 43: 125105 (2016)
[19]	C. R. Morton et al, Phys. Rev. C, 64: 034604 (2001)
[20]	A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure Vol. 2: Nuclear Deformations, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998
[21]	A. Saxena and V. S. Ramamurthy, Pramana J. Phys., 27: 15 (1986)
[22]	B. S. Ishkhanov and V. N. Orlin, Phys. At. Nucl., 68: 1352 (2005)
[23]	G. Scamps, D. Lacroix, G. G. Adamian and N. V. Antonenko, Phys. Rev. C, 88: 064327 (2013)
[24]	G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko, L. A. Malov, G. Scamps, and D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. C, 90: 034322 (2014)
[25]	I. Dutt and R. K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C, 81: 047601 (2010)
[26]	C. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett., 31: 766 (1973)
[27]	R. Kumar, M. Bansal, S. K. Arun and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C, 80: 034618 (2009)
[28]	K. Hagino and N. Takigawa, Prog. Theor. Phys., 128: 1061 (2012)
[29]	R. Kumar, Phys. Rev. C, 84: 044613 (2011)
[30]	D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev., 89: 1102 (1953); T. D. Thomas, ibid. 116, 703 (1959)
[31]	Yibin Qian, Zhongzhou Ren and Dongdong Ni, Phys. Rev. C, 83: 044317 (2011)
[32]	Yibin Qian and Zhongzhou Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 84: 064307 (2011)
[33]	R. Kumari, R. K. Puri, Nucl. Phys. A, 933: 135 (2015)
[34]	P. Mller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, H. Sagawa, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 109: 1 (2016)
[35]	R. K. Gupta, M. Balasubramaniam, R. Kumar, N. Singh, M. Manhas and W. Greiner, J Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 31: 631 (2005)
[36]	S. Gil et al, Phys. Rev. C, 31: 1752 (1985)
[37]	H. Freiesleben, J. R. Huizenga, Nucl. Phys. A, 224: 503 (1974)
[38]	N. N Ajitanand et al, Phys. Rev. C, 40: 1854 (1989)
[39]	P. Limkilde, G. Sletten, Nucl. Phys. A, 199: 504 (1973)
[40]	R. Raabe, J. L. Sida, J. L. Charvet et al, Nature, 431: 823 (2004)
[41]	Alain Fleury, F. H. Ruddy, M. N. Namboodiri et al, Phys. Rev. C, 7: 1231 (1973)

[1]	Xiao-Tao He , Chen Wang , Kai-Yuan Zhang , Cai-Wan Shen . Possible existence of bound nuclei beyond neutron drip lines driven by deformation. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(10): 101001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac1b99
[2]	Ying Cui , Ying-Xun Zhang , Zhu-Xia Li . In-medium NN→NΔ cross section and its dependence on effective Lagrange parameters in isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 024105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/024105
[3]	V. Dehghani , S. A. Alavi . Empirical formulas for proton decay half-lives: Role of nuclear deformation and Q-value. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 104101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/104101
[4]	Rajnikant Makwana , S. Mukherjee , Jian-Song Wang , Zhi-Qiang Chen . New empirical formula for (γ, n) reaction cross section near GDR peak for elements with Z≥60. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(4): 044105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/044105
[5]	S. A. Seyyedi , H. Golnarkar . Nuclear matter incompressibility effect on the cross-section offusion reactions with a weakly bound projectile. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(8): 084103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/8/084103
[6]	FAN Guang-Wei , CAI Xiao-Lu , HAN Ti-Fei , LI Xue-Chao , REN Zhong-Zhou , XU Wang . Big deformation in ¹⁷C. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(1): 014101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/1/014101
[7]	ZHANG Ao , GUO Wen-Jun , HUANG Jiang-Wei , YANG Lin-Meng . Isospin effect of the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross section in excited nuclear reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(5): 054103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/5/054103
[8]	FAN Guang-Wei , CAI Xiao-Lu , HAN Ti-Fei , LI Xue-Chao , REN Zhong-Zhou , XU Wang . Effect of nuclear deformation on direct capture reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(4): 044101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/4/044101
[9]	YANG Lin-Meng , GUO Wen-Jun , ZHANG Fan , NI Sheng . Study of the total reaction cross section via QMD. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(10): 104101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/10/104101
[10]	CHEN Ya-Zheng , CHEN Jun-Mou , LUO Yan-An , SHEN Hong , LI Xue-Qian . Effects of nuclear deformation on the form factorfor direct dark matter detection. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(6): 505-512 . doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/6/005
[11]	PU Zhong-Sheng , FAN Kang-Kang , SONG Guan-Qiang . Cross section measurements for (n, p) reaction on stannum isotopes at neutron energies from 13.5 to 14.6 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(5): 445-448. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/5/007
[12]	ZHANG Jun-Jie , HU Bi-Tao . Cross section of reaction ¹⁸¹Ta(p,nγ)¹⁸¹W and the influence of the spin cut-off parameter on the cross section. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(12): 1100-1104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/12/004
[13]	LI Jia-Xing , LIU Ping-Ping , WANG Jian-Song , HU Zheng-Guo , MAO Rui-Shi , SUN Zhi-Yu , LI Chen , CHEN Ruo-Fu , XU Hu-Shan , XIAO Guo-Qing , GUO Zhong-Yan . Measurement of the total reaction cross section for the mirror nuclei ¹²N and ¹²B. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(4): 452-455. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/4/006
[14]	WANG Nan , ZHOU Shan-Gui , ZHAO En-Guang . Influence of octupole deformation and orientation on the potential energy surface in the di-nuclear system model. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(10): 1615-1621. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/012
[15]	ZHONG Qi-Ping , ZHOU Zu-Ying , TANG Hong-Qing , CHEN Xiao-Liang , HE Guo-Zhu , ZHANG Qi-Wei , GUO Wei-Xin , YUAN Ji-Long , MA Xiao-Yun , WANG Qiang , RUAN Xi-Chao , LI Zhi-Hong . New detector system to measure (n,γ) reaction cross section precisely in China. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 102-105.
[16]	YE Wei , WU Feng . Influence of angular momentum on evaporation residue cross section as a probe of nuclear dissipation. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(6): 433-436. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/6/004
[17]	ZHOU Feng-Qun , YANG Xing-Qiang , WANG Wei-Feng , LI Yong , ZHANG Fang , TUO Fei , KONG Xiang-Zhong . A formula used to subtract the effect of gamma-ray of the others to that ofmeasured reaction in measurement of cross section of nuclear reaction andits application. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(11): 873-876. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/11/005
[18]	Wang Qi , Lu Jun , Xu Hushan , Li Songlin , Zhu Yongtai , Yin Xu , Fan Enjie , Zhang Yuhu , Li Zhichang , Zhao Kui , Lu Xiuqin , Hu Xiaoqing . Cross-Section Fluctuation of the Isotope Projectile-like Fragments in the Dissipative Reaction ¹⁹F+⁵¹V. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(S2): 113-120.
[19]	Wang Yongchang , Yuan Junqian , Ren Zhongliang , Wang Huamin , Yang Jingkang , Shui Yongqing , Xiang Sicang . Cross Section Measurement of the ⁶³Cu(n,α)⁶⁰Co Reaction. Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(S1): 73-77.
[20]	Wei Chunlin , Fu Deji , Xu Gongou . Variation of Nuclear Deformation with Z, N and Charge Independence of Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(S3): 309-317.

Access

Get Citation

S. A. Alavi and V. Dehghani. Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 064104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064104

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-01-28

Article Metric

Article Views(1435)
PDF Downloads(22)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness

Corresponding author: S. A. Alavi,

Corresponding author: V. Dehghani,

HTML

目录