-
Several cosmological and astrophysical observations at cosmic and galactic scales point towards the existence of dark matter in the Universe. The dark matter constitutes roughly 23% of the energy density of the Universe and roughly 75% of all the matter existing in the Universe. The Planck Collaboration [1] has measured the dark matter (DM) density to great precision and has given the relic density value
ΩDMh2=0.1198±0.0012 . The nature of DM, however, so far remains undetermined. Features of DM interactions can be determined from direct and indirect detection experiments. Direct detection experiments like DAMA/LIBRA [2, 3], CoGeNT [4], CRESST [5], CDMS [6], XENON100 [7, 8], LUX [9] and PandaX-II [10] are designed to measure the recoil momentum of a scattered atom or nucleon by DM in the chemically inert medium of the detector. These experiments involving spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent scattering cross-sections in the non-relativistic (NR) regime have reached a sensitivity level whereσSI>8×10−47 cm2 for DM mass∼30 GeV. Collider reaches in the present [11-13] and proposed [14-16] colliders aim at identifying the signature of DM particle production involving mono or di-jet events accompanied by missing energy. So far no experimental observation has made any confirmed detection and as a result a huge DM parameter space has been excluded. Indirect experiments such as FermiLAT [17-19], HESS [20] and AMS-02 [21, 22] are looking for evidence of excess cosmic rays produced in DM annihilation to Standard Model (SM) particles such as photons, leptons,b ˉb and gauge boson pairs, and so on.In the last several years, experiments like PAMELA [23, 24] have reported an excess in the positron flux without any significant excess in the proton to antiproton flux. These peaks in the
e+e− channel have also been observed in the ATIC [25] and PPB-BETS [26] balloon experiments at around 1 TeV and 500 GeV respectively. Recently, the Dark Matter Particle Explorer (DAMPE) experiment [27] has also observed a sharp peak around∼ 1.4 TeV, favouring a lepto-philic DM annihilation cross-section of the order of10−26 cm3 /s. The excess ine+e− can either be due to astrophysical events like high energy emissions from pulsars, or result from DM pair annihilation, preferentially to thee+e− channel, in our galactic neighborhood. Since the aforementioned experiments have not observed any significant excess in the anti-proton channel, the DM candidates, if any, appears to be lepton friendly, lepto-philic, and have suppressed interactions with quarks at the tree level.Most of the effort in understanding the DM phenomenon has revolved around the hypothesis that DM is a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) with mass lying between several GeV to a few TeV. WIMPs provide the simplest production mechanism for the DM relic density from the early Universe. Various UV-complete new physics extensions of the SM have been proposed essentially to solve the gauge hierarchy problem in the top-down approach, which includes theories like extra dimensions [28], supersymmetry [29-31], little Higgs [32, 33], extended two-Higgs-doublet models (2HDM) with singlets as a portal of DM interactions [34] and so on. These models naturally provide DM candidates or WIMPs whose mass scales are close to that of electroweak physics. However, the direct detection experiments have shrunk the parameter space of the simplified and popular models where the WIMPs are made to interact with the visible world via neutral scalars or gauge bosons.
The model-independent DM-SM particle interactions have also been studied in an effective field theory (EFT) approach where the DM-SM interaction mediator is believed to be much heavier than the lighter mass scale of DM and SM interactions. The EFT approach provides a simple, flexible approach to investigate various aspects of DM phenomenology. The EFT approach treats the interaction between DM and SM particles as a contact interaction described by non-renormalizable operators. In the context of DM phenomenology, each operator describes different processes, such as DM annihilation, scattering and DM production in collider searches, with each process at its own energy scale, which is required to be smaller than the cut-off scale
Λeff≫ the typical energy E. The nature of these interactions is encapsulated in a set of coefficients corresponding to a limited number of Lorentz and gauge-invariant dimension-5 and dimension-6 effective operators constructed with the light degrees of freedom. The constrained parameter space from various experimental data then essentially maps the viable UV-complete theoretical models. The generic effective Lagrangian for scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector and axial vector interactions of SM particles with dark matter candidates of spin0, 1/2,1 and3/2 have been studied in the literature [35-40].Sensitivity analyses for DM-quark effective interactions at the LHC have been performed [12, 13, 41-44] in a model-independent way for the dominant (a) mono-jet +
⧸ET , (b) mono-b jet +⧸ET and (c) mono-t jet +⧸ET processes. Similarly, analyses of DM-gauge boson effective couplings at the LHC have been done in Refs. [45-47]. Sensitivity analyses of the coefficients for the lepto-philic operators have also been performed through thee+e−→γ + ⧸ET [48-50] ande+e−→Z0+⧸ET [16, 51] channels.In the context of deep inelastic lepton-hadron scattering, Gross and Wilczek [52] analyzed the twist-2 operators appearing in the operator-product expansion of two weak currents along with the renormalization group equations of their coefficients for asymptotically free gauge theories. A similar analysis was done in Ref. [53] for the effective DM-nucleon scattering induced by twist-2 quark operators in the supersymmetric framework where DM is identified with the lightest supersymmetric particle - the neutralino. In Refs. [54-56], the one-loop effect in DM-nucleon scattering induced by twist-2 quark and gluonic operators for scalar, vector and fermionic DM particles was calculated.
Although there exist many studies of dimension-5 and dimension-6 lepto-philic operators, only a few of them are invariant under SM gauge symmetry. As discussed above, the contributions of the cosmologicallyconstrained effective operators are not only sensitive at DM direct and indirect detection experiments but are also important in direct searches at high energy colliders. In fact, operators which do not meet the SM gauge symmetry requirement will not be able to maintain perturbative unitarity [57] due to their bad high energy behaviour at collider-accessible energies comparable to the electroweak scale
∼246 GeV. Thus the remaining dimension-5 and dimension-6 operators based on SM gauge symmetry and on the principle of perturbative unitarity may not contribute to the2→2 scattering processes relevant for direct detection experiments and should not be considered in production channels at high energy colliders. It is in this context that the study of additional SM gauge-invariant operators of dimension greater than six is important and needs to be undertaken [58, 59].In this paper we consider a DM current that couples primarily to the SM leptons through the
SU(2)L×U(1)Y gauge-invariant effective operators. To ensure the invariance of SM gauge symmetry at all energy scales, we restrict our dark matter candidates to be self-conjugate: a Majorana fermion, a real spin 0 or a real spin 1 SM gauge singlet. In Section II, we formulate the effective interaction Lagrangian for fermionic, scalar and vector DM with SM leptons via twist-2 dimension-8 operators. In Section III, the coefficients of the effective Lagrangian are constrained from the observed relic density and a consistency check is performed from indirect and direct experiments. The constraints from LEP and the sensitivity analysis of the coefficients of the effective operators at the proposed ILC are discussed in Section IV. We summarise our results in section V. -
Following earlier authors [60-62], the interaction between dark matter particles (
χ0, ϕ0 & V0 ) and SM leptons is assumed to be mediated by a heavy mediator which can be a scalar, vector or a fermion. The effective contact interaction between the dark matter particles and leptons is obtained by evaluating the Wilson coefficients appropriate for the contact interaction terms up to dimension 8. The mediator mass is assumed to be greater than all the other masses in the model and sets the cut-off scaleΛeff . We then obtain the following effective operators for self-conjugate spin-12 , spin-0 and spin-1 dark matter particles interacting with the leptons:Lspin1/2DMeff.Int.=αχ0SΛ4effO1/2S+αχ0T1Λ4effO1/2T1+αχ0AVΛ2effO1/2AV,
(1) Lspin0DMeff.Int.=αϕ0SΛ4effO0S+αϕ0T2Λ4effO0T2,
(2) Lspin1DMeff.Int.=αV0SΛ4effO1S+αV0T2Λ4effO1T2+αV0AVΛ2effO1AV,
(3) with
O1/2S≡mχ0 (¯χ0χ0)ml(¯ll),
(4) O1/2T1≡¯χ0i∂μγνχ0Olμν + h.c.,
(5) O1/2AV≡¯χ0γμγ5χ0(¯lγμγ5l),
(6) O0S≡m2ϕ0 ϕ02ml(¯ll),
(7) O0T2≡ϕ0i∂μi∂νϕ0Olμν + h.c.,
(8) O1S≡m2V0 V0μV0μml(¯ll),
(9) O1T2≡ V0ρi∂μi∂νV0ρOlμν + h.c.,
(10) O1AV≡i ϵμνρσV0μ i ∂ν V0ρ(¯lγσγ5l).
(11) The effective operators given above can be seen to be
SU(2)L⊗U(1)Y gauge-invariant by noting that the leptonic bilinear terms written in terms of left- and right-handed gauge eigenstateslL andeR can be combined to give the above operators. The term proportional to the lepton massml is obtained by integrating out the Higgs in the EFT formalism. However, this term is only valid up to the weak scale.The twist-2 operators
Olμν for charged leptons are defined as:Olμν≡i2 ¯lL (DLμγν+DLνγμ−12gμν⧸DL) lL + i2 ¯eR (DRμγν+DRνγμ−12gμν⧸DR) eR,
(12) where
DμL andDμR are the covariant derivatives given by:DLμ≡i ∂μ − 12g →τ⋅→Wμ + 12g′ Bμ,DRμ≡i ∂μ + g′ Bμ.
(13) The Lorentz structure of the operators determines the nature of dominant DM pair annihilation cross-sections. It turns out that the scalar and axial-vector operator contributions for fermionic and vector DM respectively are p-wave suppressed.
-
In the early Universe the DM particles were in thermal equilibrium with the plasma through the creation and annihilation of DM particles. The relic density contribution of the DM particles is obtained by numerically solving the Boltzmann equation [63] to give:
ΩDMh2=π√geff(xF)√90xFT30 gMPlρc⟨σann|→v|⟩geff(xF)≈0.12xF28√geff(xF)102×10−26cm3/s⟨σann|→v|⟩,
(14) and
xF at freeze-out is given by:xF=log[a(a+2)√458gMPlmDM⟨σann|→v|⟩2π3√xFgeff(xF)],
(15) where a is a parameter of the order of one.
geff is the effective number of degrees of freedom and is taken to be92 near the freeze-out temperature, andg=2, 1 and 3 for fermionic, scalar and vector DM particles respectively.The relevant annihilation cross-sections are given in Appendix A. We have computed the relic density numerically using MadDM [64] and MadGraph [65], generating the input model file using the Lagrangian given in Eqs. (1)-(11). Figure 1 shows the contour graphs in the effective cut-off
Λeff and DM mass plane for the fermionic, scalar and vector DM particles. For arbitrary values of the couplingα , the effective cut-offΛeff is obtained by noting thatΛeff for scalar and twist-2 tensor operators scales asα1/4 whereas for AV operatorsΛeff scales asα1/2 . We have shown the graphs by taking one operator at a time and taking the couplingα′s=1 . We have made sure that perturbative unitarity of the EFT is maintained for the entire parameter space scanned in Fig. 1. The points lying on the solid lines satisfy the observed relic densityΩDMh2=0.1198 . The region below the corresponding solid line is the cosmologically allowed parameter region of the respective operator. We find from Fig. 1(a) that the scalar operator for the fermionic DM is sensitive to the low DM mass.Figure 1. (color online) Relic density contours satisfying
ΩDMh2 =0.1198±0.0012 in the DM mass -Λeff plane. All contours are drawn assuming universal lepton flavor couplings of effective DM-lepton interactions. The region below the corresponding solid line is the cosmologically allowed parameter region of the respective operator. -
DM annihilation in the dense regions of the Universe would generate a high flux of energetic SM particles. The Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) [17-19] has produced the strongest limit on DM annihilation cross-sections for singular annihilation final states to
b ˉb, τ ˉτ , etc. In the case of DM particles annihilating into multiple channels, the bounds on cross-sections have been analysed in Ref. [66]. In our case we display the bounds from Fermi-LAT in Fig. 2, assuming the DM particles considered in this article to couple only toτ -leptons i.e.τ -philic DM.Figure 2. (color online) DM annihilation cross-section to
τ+τ− . Solid lines in all figures show the variation of DM annihilation cross-section with DM mass where all other parameters are taken from the observed relic density. The median of the DM annihilation cross-section, derived from a combined analysis of the nominal target sample for theτ+τ− channel assuming 100% branching fraction, restricts the allowed shaded region from above. v is taken to be∼10−3 c .In Fig. 2 we show the prediction for dark matter annihilation cross-section into
τ+τ− for the set of parameters which satisfy the relic density constraints for theτ -philic DM particles. These cross-sections are compared with the upper bounds on the allowed annihilation cross-sections in theτ+τ− channel obtained from the Fermi-LAT data [17-19]. The Fermi-LAT data puts a lower limit on the DM particle mass even though allowed by the relic-density observations. Likewise Fermi-LAT puts severe constraints on the twist-2O1/2T1 operator (Fig. 2(a)) for fermionic DM and theO0S operator (Fig. 2(b)) for scalar DM. There is a minimum dark matter particle mass allowed by Fermi-LAT observations. -
Direct detection experiments [2-10] look for the scattering of a nucleon or atom by DM particles. These experiments are designed to measure the recoil momentum of the nucleons or atoms of the detector material. This scattering can be broadly classified as (a) DM-nucleon, (b) DM-atom and (c) DM-electron scattering. Since lepto-philic DM does not have direct interaction with quarks or gluons at the tree level, the DM-nucleon interaction can only be induced at the loop levels.
It has been shown [67] and has been independently verified by us that the event rate for direct detection of DM-atom scattering is suppressed by a factor of
∼10−7 with respect to the DM-electron elastic scattering, which is in turn is suppressed by a factor of∼10−10 with respect to the loop-induced DM-nucleon scattering. In this article we restrict ourselves to the scattering of DM particles with free electrons.σχ0e−S=αχ0S2π m2χ0Λ8eff m4e ≃ αχ0S2 (mχ0200 GeV)2 (1 TeVΛeff)8 3.09×10−61 cm2,
(16) σχ0e−T1=36 αχ0T12π m2χ0Λ8eff m4e ≃ αχ0T12 (mχ0200 GeV)2 (1TeVΛeff)8 1.11×10−59 cm2,
(17) σχ0e−AV=3 αχ0AV2π m2eΛ4eff ≃ αχ0AV2 (1TeVΛeff)4 9.27×10−47 cm2,
(18) σϕ0e−S=αϕ0S2π m2ϕ0Λ8eff m4e ≃ αϕ0S2 (mϕ0200 GeV)2 (1TeVΛeff)8 3.09×10−61 cm2,
(19) σϕ0e−T2=916 αϕ0T22π m4ϕ0Λ8eff m2e ≃ αϕ0T22 (mϕ0200 GeV)4 (1TeVΛeff)8 2.78×10−50 cm2,
(20) σV0e−S=αV0S2π m2V0Λ8eff m4e ≃ αV0S2 (mV0200 GeV)2 (1TeVΛeff)8 3.09×10−61 cm2,
(21) σV0e−T2=916 αV0T22π m4V0Λ8eff m2e ≃ αV0T22 (mV0200 GeV)4 (1TeVΛeff)8 2.78×10−50 cm2,
(22) σV0e−AV=1144 αV0AV2π 1Λ4eff m4em2V0 v4 ≃ αV0AV2(200 GeVmV0)2(1TeVΛeff)4v4 1.34×10−60 cm2,
(23) We find that the electron-DM scattering cross-sections are dominated by the effective interactions mediated by the
AV operatorO1/2AV for fermionic DM and by the twist-2 operatorsO0T2 andO1T2 for scalar and vector DM respectively. In Fig. 3, we plot the DM-free electron scattering cross-section as a function of DM mass only for the dominant operators as discussed above. The other operator contributions are negligible in comparison. The cross-sections for a given DM mass are computed with the corresponding value ofΛeff satisfying the observed relic density for these operators. These results are then compared with the null results of DAMA/LIBRA [2, 3] at 90% confidence level for DM-electron scattering and XENON100 [7, 8] at 90% confidence level for inelastic DM-atom scattering.Figure 3. (color online) DM-free electron elastic scattering cross-section as a function of DM mass. The solid lines are drawn for the dominant operators
O1/2AV, O0T2 andO1T2 for fermionic, scalar and vector DM particles respectively. The exclusion plots from DAMA at 90% C.L. for the case of DM-electron scattering are also shown [67]. Bounds at 90% C.L. are shown for XENON100 from inelastic DM-atom scattering [68]. The dashed curves show the 90% C.L. constraint from the Super-Kamiokande limit on neutrinos from the Sun, by assuming annihilation intoτ+τ− [67]. -
Existing results and observations from LEP data can be used for putting constraints on the effective operators. The cross-section for the process
e+e−→γ⋆+DM pair is compared with the combined analysis from the DELPHI and L3 collaborations fore+e−→γ⋆+Z→qiˉqi+νljˉνlj at√s =196.9 GeV and an integrated luminosity of 679.4 pb−1 , whereqi≡u,d,s andνlj≡νe,νμ,ντ . The Feynman diagrams contributing to the production ofγ/γ⋆ with missing energy induced by lepto-philic operators at a leptone−e+ collider are shown in Fig. 4. The measured cross-section from the combined analysis for the said process is found to be0.055 pb, with the measured statistical errorδσstat , systematic errorδσsyst and total errorδσtot of0.031 pb,0.008 pb and0.032 pb respectively [69]. Hence, the contribution due to an additional channel containing the final-state DM pairs and resulting in the missing energy along with two quark jets can be constrained from the observedδσtot . In Fig. 5, we have plotted the 95% C.L. solid line contours satisfyingδσtot ≈ 0.032 pb, corresponding to the operators in the DM mass-Λeff plane. The region under the solid lines corresponding to the operator as shown is disallowed by the combined LEP analysis. The phenomenologically interesting DM mass range⩽50 GeV is completely disfavored by the LEP experiments, except for the operatorO1/2AV .Figure 4. Feynman diagrams contributing to the production of
γ/γ⋆ with missing energy induced by lepto-philic operators (5)-(11) at a leptone−e+ collider.Figure 5. (color online) Solid lines depict the contours in the plane defined by DM mass and the kinematic reach of for
e+e−→DMpairs+γ⋆→⧸ET+qiˉqi at√s = 196.9 GeV and an integrated luminosity of 679.4 pb−1 , satisfying the constraintδσtot =0.032 pb obtained from combined analysis of DELPHI and L3 [69]. The regions below the solid lines are forbidden by LEP observation. The regions below the dashed lines corresponding to respective operators satisfy the relic density constraintΩDMh2≤ 0.1198±0.0012 . -
In this subsection we study the DM pair production processes accompanied by an on-shell photon at the proposed International Linear Collider (ILC) for the DM mass range
∼ 50 - 500 GeV: (a)e+e−→χ0¯χ0γ , (b)e+e−→ϕ0ϕ0γ , and (c)e+e−→ V0V0γ as shown in Figs 8-10. The dominant SM background for thee+e−→⧸ET+γ signature comes from theZγ production process:e+e−→Z+γ→∑νiˉνi+γ .The analyses for the background and the signal processes corresponding to the accelerator parameters as conceived in the Technical Design Report for ILC [70, 71], given in Table 1, were performed by simulating SM backgrounds and DM signatures using Madgraph [65], MadAnalysis 5 [72] and the model file generated by FeynRules [73]. We impose the following cuts to reduce the backgrounds for the DM pair production in association with a mono-photon:
ILC-250 ILC-500 ILC-1000 √s(inGeV) 250 500 1000 Lint(infb−1) 250 500 1000 σBG(pb) 1.07 1.48 2.07 ∙ Transverse momentum of photonpTγ⩾ 10 GeV,∙ Pseudo-rapidity of photon is restricted to|ηγ|⩽ 2.5,∙ disallowed recoil photon energy against on-shell Z2Eγ/√s⧸ϵ[0.8,0.9] ,[0.95,0.98] and[0.98,0.99] for√s = 250 GeV, 500 GeV and 1 TeV respectively.The shape profiles corresponding to the mono-photon with missing energy processes can be studied in terms of the kinematic observables
pTγ andηγ , as they are found to be the most sensitive. We generate the normalized one-dimensional distributions for the SM background processes and signals induced by the relevant operators. To study the dependence on DM mass, we plot the normalized differential cross-sections in Figs. 6 and 7 for three representative values of DM mass,75, 225 and325 GeV, at center of mass energy√s=1 TeV and an integrated luminosity 1ab−1 .Figure 6. (color online) Normalized 1-dimensonal differential cross-sections with respect to
pTγ corresponding to the SM processes, and those induced by lepto-philic operators at three representative values of DM mass: 75, 225 and 325 GeV.Figure 7. (color online) Normalized 1-dimensonal differential cross-sections with respect to
ηγ corresponding to the SM processes, and those induced by lepto-philic operators at the three representative values of DM mass: 75, 225 and 325 GeV.The sensitivity of
Λeff with respect to DM mass is enhanced by computing theX2 with the double differential distributions of kinematic observablespTγ andηγ corresponding to the background and signal processes for: (i) 50 GeV⩽mDM⩽ 125 GeV at√s = 250 GeV and an integrated luminosity of 250 fb−1 ; (ii) 100 GeV⩽mDM⩽ 250 GeV at√s = 500 GeV and an integrated luminosity of 500 fb−1 ; and (iii) 100 GeV⩽mDM⩽ 500 GeV at√s = 1 TeV and an integrated luminosity of 1 ab−1 . TheX2 is defined asX2≡X2(mDM,αiΛneff)=n1∑j=1n2∑i=1[ΔNNPij(ΔpTγ)i(Δηγ)j√ΔNSM+NPij(ΔpTγ)i(Δηγ)j+δ2sys{ΔNSM+NPij(ΔpTγ)i(Δηγ)j}2]2,
(24) where
ΔNNPij andΔNSM+NPij are the number of New Physics and total differential events respectively in the two-dimensional[(ΔpTγ)i−(Δηγ)j]th grid. Hereδsys represents the total systematic error in the measurement.Adopting a conservative value of 1% for the systematic error and using the collider parameters given in Table 1, we simulate the two-dimension differential distributions to calculate the
X2 . In Figs. 8-10, we have plotted the3σ contours at 99.73% C.L in themDM−Λeff plane corresponding to√s=250 GeV, 500 GeV and 1 TeV respectively for the effective operators satisfying perturbative unitarity.Figure 8. (color online) Solid lines depict
3σ with 99.73 % C.L. contours in themDM−Λeff plane from theX2 analyses of thee+e−→⧸ET+γ signature at the proposed ILC designed for√s = 250 GeV with an integrated luminosity 250 fb−1 . The regions below the solid lines corresponding to the respective contour are accessible for discovery with⩾ 99.73% C.L. The regions below the dashed lines corresponding to respective operators satisfy the relic density constraintΩDMh2⩽ 0.1198±0.0012 .Figure 9. (color online) Solid lines depict
3σ with 99.73 % C.L. contours in themDM−Λeff plane from theX2 analyses of thee+e−→⧸ET+γ signature at the proposed ILC designed for√s = 500 GeV with an integrated luminosity 500 fb−1 . The regions below the solid lines corresponding to the respective contour are accessible for discovery with⩾ 99.73% C.L. The regions below the dashed lines corresponding to respective operators satisfy the relic density constraintΩDMh2⩽ 0.1198±0.0012 .Figure 10. (color online) Solid lines depict
3σ with 99.73 % C.L. contours in themDM−Λeff plane from theX2 analyses of thee+e−→⧸ET+γ signature at the proposed ILC designed for√s = 1 TeV with an integrated luminosity 1 ab−1 . The regions below the solid lines corresponding to the respective contour are accessible for discovery with⩾ 99.73% C.L. The regions below the dashed lines corresponding to respective operators satisfy the relic density constraintΩDMh2⩽ 0.1198±0.0012 .The sensitivity of mono-photon searches can be improved by considering the polarised initial beams [74, 75]. For illustration, we consider +80 % polarised
e− and -30 % polarisede+ initial beams. In Table 2, we show the3σ reach of the cut-offΛeff fromX2 analysis for two representative values of DM mass,75 and225 GeV, at the proposed ILC for√s=500 GeV with an integrated luminosity500 fb−1 for unpolarised and polarised initial beams, and find improvement in theΛeff sensitivity for the polarised beams.Unpolarised Polarised √s in GeV500 500 L in fb−1 500 500 (Pe−,Pe+) (0, 0) (0.8, −0.3) mDM in GeV75 225 75 225 O1/2T1 956.1 766.4 1135.7 948.0 O1/2AV 2994.4 1629.4 2998.6 2345.5 O0T2 461.8 319.1 767.8 373.2 O1T2 1751.4 361.8 1651.2 444.3 O1AV 5718.0 777.3 5976.2 1129.8 Table 2. Estimation of
3σ reach of the cut-offΛeff in GeV fromX2 analysis for two representative values of DM mass,75 and225 GeV, at proposed ILC for√s=500 GeV with an integrated luminosity500 fb−1 , for unpolarised and polarised initial beams. -
In this article we have studied DM phenomenology in an effective field theory framework. We have considered SM gauge-invariant contact interactions between dark matter particles and leptons up to dimension 8. To ensure the invariance of SM gauge symmetry at all energy scales, we have restricted ourselves to self-conjugate DM particles, namely a Majorana fermion, a real scalar or a real vector. We have estimated their contribution to the relic density and obtained constraints on the parameters of the theory from the observed relic density
ΩDMh2=0.1198±0.0012 . Indirect detection data from FermiLAT puts a lower limit on the allowed DM mass. The data also puts severe constraints on the twist-2O1/2T1 operator for the fermionic DM and scalarO0S operator for scalar DM.Analysis of the existing LEP data disallows the phenomenologically interesting DM mass range
⩽50 GeV, except for theO1/2AV operator. We then performedX2 -analysis for the pair production of DM particles at the proposed ILC for DM mass range∼50−500 GeV, for the relevant operators discussed in Table 1 We find that in themDM−Λeff region allowed by the relic density and indirect detection data, higher sensitivity can be obtained from the dominant mono-photon signal at the proposed ILC, particularly for twist-2 operators. -
For low mass DM, our attention was drawn by the referee to the fact that in addition to on-shell Z production at LEP, the future FCC-ee and CEPC will be sources of large numbers of Zs, producing Tera Zs. This may result in competitive constraints [76, 77] on the twist-2 operators with covariant derivatives compared to the ISR and FSR processes considered from the ILC.
-
We thank Sukanta Dutta for discussions and his initial participation in this work. HB thanks Mihoko Nojiri and Mamta Dahiya for suggestions. HB acknowledges the CSIR-JRF fellowship and support from CSIR grant 03(1340)/ 15/ EMR-II.
-
Annihilation cross-sections for the operators given in Eqs. (4) - (11) are given respectively as:
σannS|→v|(χ0¯χ0→l+l−)=18παχ0S2Λ8effm4χ0m2l[1−m2lm2χ0]3/2|→v|2,
σannT1|→v|(χ0¯χ0→l+l−)=12παχ0T12Λ8effm6χ0√1−m2lm2χ0×[2+m2lm2χ0+(76−1116m2lm2χ0−6548m4lm4χ0)|→v|2],
σannAV|→v|(χ0¯χ0→l+l−)=12π αχ0AV2Λ4eff m2l √1−m2lm2χ0[1+(13m2χ0m2l−56−76m2lm2χ0) |→v|2],
σannS|→v|(ϕ0ϕ0→l+l−)=14π αϕ0S2Λ8effm4ϕ0 m2l√1−m2lm2ϕ0[1−m2lm2ϕ0+(−32+154m2lm2ϕ0) |→v|2],
σannT2|→v|(ϕ0ϕ0→l+l−)=14π αϕ0T22Λ8effm6ϕ0 √1−m2lm2ϕ0×[m2lm2ϕ0−m4lm4ϕ0+(512m2lm2ϕ0−1324m4lm4ϕ0) |→v|2],
σannS|→v|(V0V0→l+l−)=112π αV0S2Λ8effm4V0 m2l √1−m2lm2V0×[1−m2lm2V0+(12+74m2lm2V0) |→v|2],
σannT2|→v|(V0V0→l+l−)=112 π αV0T22Λ8effm6V0 √1−m2lm2V0×[m2lm2V0−m4lm4V0+(34m2lm2V0−78m4lm4V0) |→v|2],
σannAV|→v|(V0V0→l+l−)=154π αV0AV2Λ4effm2V0 √1−m2lm2V0[4−7m2lm2V0] |→v|2.
Effective field theory approach to lepto-philic self-conjugate dark matter
- Received Date: 2020-09-01
- Available Online: 2021-02-15
Abstract: We study self-conjugate dark matter (DM) particles interacting primarily with Standard Model (SM) leptons in an effective field theoretical framework. We consider SM gauge-invariant effective contact interactions between Majorana fermion, real scalar and real vector DM with leptons by evaluating the Wilson coefficients appropriate for interaction terms up to dimension 8, and obtain constraints on the parameters of the theory from the observed relic density, indirect detection observations and from the DM-electron scattering cross-sections in direct detection experiments. Low energy LEP data has been used to study sensitivity in the pair production of low mass (