-
The action of scalar-tensor theories can be addressed in two conformally linked frames namely, the Jordan and Einstein frames. In the Jordan frame, the MBD scalar field acts as a spin-zero component of gravity while it behaves as a matter source in the conformally redefined frame. The Jordan formularization results in an unstable system because of the non-positive energy density of the scalar field. However, the non-minimal coupling of the scalar field to normal matter prompts non-geodesic ways for test particles in the Einstein frame [36]. Nevertheless, the violation in the Einstein frame is trivial and the frame remains consistent with the tests of the equivalence principle. The action of MBD gravity in the Jordan frame [19] with relativistic units
$ 8\pi = G = c = 1 $ is characterized as$ S = \int\sqrt{-g}\left({\cal{R}}\Phi-\frac{\omega_{\rm BD}}{\Phi}\nabla^{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha}\Phi -{\cal{L}}(\Phi)+{\cal{L}}_m\right) {\rm d}^{4}x, $
(1) where
$ g = |g_{\alpha\beta}| $ ,$ {\cal{R}} $ , and$ {\cal{L}}_m $ are the determinant of the metric tensor, the Ricci scalar, and the matter Lagrangian, respectively, Φ is a scalar field, and$ \omega_{BD} $ is a dimensionless BD coupling constant. Here, the function$ {\cal{L}}(\Phi) $ completely specifies the scalar-tensor theory. For the present study, we define$ {\cal{A}}(\Phi) = {\rm Exp}\left[{\frac{\Phi^2}{(2 \omega_{\rm BD}+3)^{1/2}}}\right] , {\cal{L}}(\Phi) = \frac{1}{2}m_{\Phi}^2\Phi^2 , $
(2) where
$ m_{\Phi} $ is the mass of the scalar field. For the form of scalar field function expressed in (2), the two rapidly and slowly turning NSs have effectively been investigated by Doneva et al. [37] and Yazadjiev et al. [22]. The scalar field$ \hat{\Phi} $ and metric$ \hat{g}_{\alpha\beta} $ can be obtained for the Einstein frame by means of the transformations$ \Phi = {\cal{A}}^{-2}(\hat{\Phi}) $ and$ \hat{g}_{\alpha\beta} = {\cal{A}}^{-2}(\Phi){g}_{\alpha\beta} $ . The MBD field equations and evolution equation, through the variation of action (1) with respect to$ g_{\alpha\beta} $ and Φ, are given explicitly as follows:$ \begin{aligned}[b] G_{\alpha\beta} =& R_{\alpha\beta}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\alpha\beta}R\\ =& \frac{1}{\Phi}\Bigg[T_{\alpha\beta}^{\rm (matt)}+T_{\alpha\beta}^{\Phi}\Bigg]\\ =& \frac{1}{\Phi}\Bigg[T_{\alpha\beta}^{\rm (matt)} +\Phi_{,\alpha;\beta}-g_{\alpha\beta}\Box\Phi+\frac{\omega_{\rm BD}}{\Phi} \Bigg[\Phi_{,\alpha}\Phi_{,\beta}\\ &- \frac{g_{\alpha\beta}\Phi_{,\alpha}\Phi^{,\alpha}}{2}\Bigg]-\frac{{\cal{L}}(\Phi)g_{\alpha\beta}}{2}\Bigg], \end{aligned} $
(3) $ \Box\Phi = \frac{1}{3+2\omega_{\rm BD}}\Bigg[T^{\rm (matt)}+\Phi\frac{{\rm d}{\cal{L}}(\Phi)}{{\rm d}\Phi}-2{\cal{L}}(\Phi)\Bigg],$
(4) where
$T_{\alpha\beta}^{\rm (matt)}$ describes the stress-energy tensor in the Einstein frame and$T^{\rm (matt)}$ is its trace, with$ \Box $ being the d'Alembertian operator. The stress-energy tensor in Einstein frame is linked to its conformal counterpart$ \hat{T}_{\alpha\beta} $ through$ T_{\alpha\beta} = {\cal{A}}^{2}(\Phi)\hat{T}_{\alpha\beta} $ .We suppose that the interior space-time line element for a static and spherically symmetric is represented by the following form
$ {\rm d}s^2 = {\rm e}^{\eta(r)}{\rm d}t^2-{\rm e}^{\xi(r)}{\rm d}r^2-r^2({\rm d}\theta^2+\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2), $
(5) where
$ \eta(r) $ and$ \xi(r) $ are the unknown metric potentials that have functional dependence on the radial coordinate, r, only. Heavenly systems are defined by anisotropic pressure and inhomogeneous energy density, which take a dominant part in their development. In this regard, we argue that the physical features (energy density (ρ), radial ($ p_r $ )/transverse ($ p_t $ ) pressure)) of cosmic bodies with an anisotropic distribution are specified via the following stress-energy tensor$ T_{\alpha\beta}^{\rm (matt)} = (\rho+p_t) u_{\alpha}u_{\beta}-p_t g_{\alpha\beta}+(p_r-p_t)s_{\alpha}s_{\beta}, $
(6) here
$u_\alpha = ({\rm e}^{\frac{\eta}{2}},0,0,0)$ and$s_{\beta} = (0,-{\rm e}^{\frac{\xi}{2}},0,0)$ represent the four-speed of a comoving observer and the radial four-vector, respectively. Further,$ \rho,\; p_r $ , and$ p_t $ denote the energy density, radial, and transverse pressures, respectively. Employing Eqs. (3)–(6), the field equations are acquired as$ \frac{1}{r^2}-{\rm e}^{-\xi}\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{\xi'}{r}\right) = \frac{1}{\Phi}({\rho}+T_0^{0\Phi}),$
(7) $ -\frac{1}{r^2}+{\rm e}^{-\xi}\left(\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{\eta'}{r}\right) = \frac{1}{\Phi}({p_r}-T_1^{1\Phi}),$
(8) $ \frac{{\rm e}^{-\xi}}{4}\left(2\eta''+\eta'^2-\xi'\eta'+2\frac{\eta'-\xi'}{r}\right) = \frac{1}{\Phi}({p}_{t}-T_2^{2\Phi}),$
(9) Further, the prime symbol indicates differentiation with respect to the radial coordinate, r, and the expressions of
$ T_0^{0\Phi},\; T_1^{1\Phi} $ , and$ T_2^{2\Phi} $ are given as$ T_0^{0\Phi} = {\rm e}^{-\xi}\left[\Phi''+\left(\frac{2}{r}-\frac{\xi'}{2} \right)\Phi'+\frac{\omega_{\rm BD}}{2\Phi}\Phi'^2-{\rm e}^\xi\frac{{\cal{L}}(\Phi)} {2}\right],$
(10) $ T_1^{1\Phi} = {\rm e}^{-\xi}\left[\left(\frac{2}{r}+\frac{\eta'} {2}\right)\Phi'-\frac{\omega_{\rm BD}}{2\Phi}\Phi'^2-{\rm e}^\xi\frac{{\cal{L}}(\Phi)}{2})\right], $
(11) $ T_2^{2\Phi} = {\rm e}^{-\xi}\left[\Phi''+\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{\xi'} {2}+\frac{\eta'}{2}\right)\Phi'+\frac{\omega_{\rm BD}}{2\Phi}\Phi'^2-{\rm e}^\xi\frac{{\cal{L}}(\Phi)}{2} \right].$
(12) The wave equation expressed in (4) turns out to be
$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Box\Phi =& -{\rm e}^{-\xi}\left[\left(\frac{2}{r}-\frac{\xi'} {2} +\frac{\eta'}{2}\right)\Phi'(r)+\Phi''(r)\right]\\ =& \frac{1}{2}{\rm e}^{\xi}\left[\frac{{\cal{A}}^{4}(\Phi)}{\left(3+2\omega_{\rm BD}\right)^{1/2}}\left(\rho -p_r -2 p_t\right) -\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\rm d}{\cal{L}}(\Phi)}{{\rm d}\Phi}\right]. \end{aligned} $
(13) It was demonstrated that if a symmetric tensor
$ b_{\alpha\beta} $ fulfills the Gauss-Codazi equations defined as$ R_{\alpha\beta\mu\upsilon} = 2eb_{\alpha[\mu}b_{\upsilon]\beta}\quad {\rm{and}} \quad b_{\alpha[\beta;\mu]}-\alpha^{\xi}_{\beta\mu}b_{\alpha\xi} +\alpha^\xi_{\alpha[\beta}b_{\mu]\xi} = 0, $
(14) the
$ (n+1)- $ dimensional space can be incorporated in an$ (n+2)- $ dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space [38]. Further,$ b_{\alpha\beta} $ are the coefficients of second differential form and$ e = \pm1 $ ,$ R_{\alpha\beta\mu\upsilon} $ indicates the curvature tensor. From the relationship expressed in (14), a necessary and sufficient condition for a class-one embedding was obtained by Eiesland [39] as follows$ R_{0101}R_{2323}-R_{1212}R_{0303}-R_{1202}R_{1303} = 0, $
(15) which prompts the accompanying differential equation for the considered metric gravitational potential
$ (\xi'-\eta')\eta'e^\xi+2(1-e^\xi)\eta''+\eta'^2 = 0. $
(16) The solution corresponding to the equation expressed in (16) turns out to be
$ \xi(r) = \ln(1+D\eta'^2e^\eta), $
(17) where D is an integration constant. To solve the stellar system of field equations, we choose
$ g_{tt} $ component of the space-time as$ \eta(r) = 4\ln \left(B^{1/4}(1+Ar^2)\right), $
(18) where A and B are positive constants. Using this gravitational potential
$ \eta(r) $ in Eq. (17), we obtain$ \xi(r) = \ln(1+ACr^2(1+Ar^2)^{2}), $
(19) where
$ C = 64ABD $ is a constant.NSs with
$ M>3M_{\bigodot} $ might turn into QSs which hold up$ (u) $ , down$ (d) $ , and strange$ (s) $ quark flavors. In this context, the matter variables viz., density and pressure representing the interior configuration of these relativistic stars, obey the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) bag equation of state (EoS). Moreover, we suppose that non-interacting and massless quarks occur within the stellar geometries. According to the MIT bag model, the quark pressure$ p_r $ may be cast as$ p_r = \sum\limits_{f}p^f-{\cal{B}},\quad f = u,\; d,\; s, $
(20) where
$ p^f $ represents the individual pressure of each quark flavor which is neutralized by the bag constant$ {\cal{B_g}} $ , also known as total external bag pressure. The total energy density of the deconfined quarks is stated by the MIT bag model as$ \rho = \sum\limits_{f}\rho^f+{\cal{B}}, $
(21) where the matter density of each flavor
$ \rho^f $ is connected to the corresponding pressure as$ \rho^f = 3p^f $ . The simplified MIT bag EoS for strange stars is concluded from Eqs. (20) and (21) as$ p_r = \frac{1}{3}(\rho-4{\cal{B}}). $
(22) It is noteworthy that this simplified form of EoS was applied with pure GR and modified gravity theories to describe the stellar systems made of the strange quark matter distribution. In the current study, the numerical solutions of the stellar system were obtained by setting
$ {\cal{B}} $ equal to$75.007\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ , which is within the allowed range [40]. The overall mass of the uncharged fluid sphere is determined via the Misner-Sharp formula as$ m = \frac{r}{2}(1-g^{\alpha\beta}r_{,\alpha}r_{,\beta}). $
(23) -
The set of parameters viz., A, B, C, D representing the geometry as well as physical properties (for example mass and radius) of anisotropic compact stellar configurations may be settled across the smooth matching of inner and outer spacetimes at the pressure-free boundary (Σ). The outer spacetime is considered to be the Schwarzschild spacetime given by,
$ {\rm d}s^2 = \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right){\rm d}t^2-\frac{1}{\left(1-\dfrac{2M}{r}\right)}{\rm d}r^2 -r^2({\rm d}\theta^2+\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2), $
(24) where M denotes the total mass. To corroborate continuity and smoothness of geometry at the surface layers of the star, the following conditions should be fulfilled at the pressure-free boundary Σ
$ (f = r-R = 0 $ , where R is the constant radius)$\begin{aligned}[b] ({\rm d}s^2_-)_{\Sigma} =& ({\rm d}s^2_+)_{\Sigma},\\ (K_{ij_-})_{\Sigma} = &(K_{ij_+})_{\Sigma},\end{aligned}$
(25) $ \begin{aligned}[b]&(\Phi(r)_-)_{\Sigma} = (\Phi(r)_+)_{\Sigma},\\&(\Phi'(r)_-)_{\Sigma} = (\Phi'(r)_+)_{\Sigma}.\end{aligned}$
(26) Here,
$ K_{ij} $ means curvature while subscripts - and + denote the interior and exterior spacetimes, respectively. The continuity of the first fundamental form viz.,$[{\rm d}s^2]_\Sigma = 0$ gives us$ [F]_\Sigma\equiv F(r\rightarrow R^+)-F(r\rightarrow R^-)\equiv F^+_R-F_R^-, $
(27) for any function
$ F(r) $ . This fundamental condition gives us$ g_{tt}^-(R) = g_{tt}^+(R) $ and$ g_{rr}^-(R) = g_{rr}^+(R) $ . In addition, the continuity of the second fundamental form ($ K_{ij} $ ) is equivalent to the O'Brien and Synge [41] matching conditions, stated as$ [G_{\alpha\beta}r^\beta]_\Sigma = 0, $
(28) where
$ r_\alpha $ denotes a unit radial vector. Using the field equations (7)–(9) along with the Eq. (28) inferred$ [T_{\alpha\beta}r^\beta]_\Sigma = 0 $ which says that radial pressure becomes zero at the boundary surface, i.e.,$ p_r(R) = 0 $ . Also, the scalar field relating to the vacuum Schwarzschild solution is determined utilizing the strategy in [42], and it becomes$\Phi = {\rm e}^{(1-\frac{2M}{r})}$ . We indicate the inner and outer zones by$ \Sigma^- $ and$ \Sigma^+ $ , respectively.The hypersurface is characterized by the line element
$ {\rm d}s^2 = {\rm d}\tau^2-R^2({\rm d}\theta^2+\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2), $
(29) here τ describes the proper time on the stellar surface. Furthermore, the extrinsic curvature of Σ is defined by
$ K_{ij}^{\pm} = -n_\alpha^{\pm}\frac{\partial^2x^\alpha_{\pm}}{\partial\eta^i\eta^j} -n_\alpha^{\pm}\alpha^\alpha_{\beta\mu}\frac{\partial x^\beta_{\pm}}{\partial\eta^i} \frac{\partial x^\mu_{\pm}}{\partial\eta^j}, $
(30) where the coordinates on the Σ are defined by
$ \eta^i $ . In addition, the components of the 4-vector normal to the hypersurface viz.,$ n_{\alpha}^\pm $ are defined in the coordinates i.e.,$ x^\alpha_{\pm} $ of$ \Sigma^\pm $ as$ n_{\alpha}^\pm = \pm \frac{{\rm d}f}{{\rm d} x^\alpha}\Big|g^{\beta\mu}\frac{{\rm d}f}{{\rm d}x^\beta}\frac{{\rm d}f}{{\rm d}x^\mu}\Big|^{\frac{-1}{2}}, $
(31) with
$ n_\alpha n^\alpha = 1 $ . The unit normal vectors have the following explicit form$ n^-_\alpha = (0,{\rm e}^{\frac{\xi}{2}},0,0),\quad n^+_\alpha = \left(0,\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}},0,0\right). $
(32) Regarding this, comparing the metrics (5) and (24) with (29), it is easy to verify that
$ \left[\frac{{\rm d}t}{{\rm d}\tau}\right]_\Sigma = [{\rm e}^{\frac{-\eta}{2}}]_\Sigma = \left[\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right]_\Sigma,\quad [r]_\Sigma = R. $
(33) Employing Eq. (32), the non-zero components of curvature are determined as
$ K_{00}^- = \left[-\frac{{\rm e}^{-\frac{\xi}{2}}\eta'}{2}\right]_\Sigma, $
(34) $ K_{22}^- = \frac{1}{\sin^2(\theta)}K_{33}^- = [r {\rm e}^{-\frac{\xi}{2}}]_\Sigma, $
(35) $ K_{00}^+ = \left[-\frac{M}{r^2}\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right]_\Sigma, $
(36) $ K_{22}^+ = \frac{1}{\sin^2(\theta)}K_{33}^+ = \left[r\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\right]_\Sigma.$
(37) The junction conditions
$ [K^-_{22}]_\Sigma = [K^+_{22}]_\Sigma $ and$ [r]_\Sigma = R $ give$ {\rm e}^{-\frac{\xi(R)}{2}} = \left(1-\frac{2M}{R}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}. $
(38) Substituting this last equation in the matching condition
$ [K^-_{00}]_\Sigma = [K^+_{00}]_\Sigma $ leads to$ \eta'(R) = \frac{2M}{R(R-2M)}. $
(39) Thus, the junction conditions expressed in Eqs. (33)–(39) supply the relations at the hypersurface in the following forms
$ {\rm e}^{\eta(R)} = B(AR^2+1)^4 = 1-\frac{2M}{R}, $
(40) $ {\rm e}^{-\xi(R)} = \frac{1}{1+ACR^2(AR^2+1)} = 1-\frac{2M}{R}, $
(41) $ \eta'(R) {\rm e}^{\eta(R)} = 8ABR(AR^2+1)^3 = \frac{2M}{R^2}. $
(42) The unknown parameters of the stellar system viz., A, B, C, D are determined by considering
$ C = 64ABD $ in the above equations, which are expressed in the following forms$ A = \frac{M}{R^2(4R-9M)}, $
(43) $ B = \frac{1}{R}(R-2M)\left(\frac{8M-4R}{9M-4R}\right)^{-4}, $
(44) $ C = 2\left(\frac{8M-4R}{9M-4R}\right)^{-3}, $
(45) $ D = \frac{R^3}{2M}.$
(46) To fix the arbitrariness of the unknown parameters, we contrast our solutions with the observational constraints from some measurements of the millisecond pulsars and their corresponding mass-radius ratio. For the gravitational potential functions expressed in Eqs. (18) and (19) along with Eqs. (43)–(46), the state variables viz., energy density and pressure components, are expressed in terms of total mass M and constant radius R as follows:
$\begin{aligned}[b] \rho =& \frac{12rf_{1}f_{2}}{\dfrac{f_{2}f_{3}(9MR^2-Mr^2-4R^3)^3}{16MR^2(2M-R)}+2r^2f_{5}}\\& + \frac{27Mrf_{1}}{f_{5}}+ {\cal{B}} - 6rf_{1}\Phi'^2(r) , \end{aligned} $
(47) $\begin{aligned}[b] p_r =& \frac{4rf_{1}f_{4}}{\dfrac{f_{2}f_{3}(9MR^2-Mr^2-4R^3)^3}{16MR^2(2M-R)}+2r^2f_{5}}\\& + \frac{9Mrf_{1}}{f_{5}}- {\cal{B}} - 2rf_{1}\Phi'^2(r), \end{aligned} $
(48) $ \begin{aligned}[b] p_t =& -4 r^2f_{1}{\cal{B}}{\cal{A}}^4(\Phi)\left( 1- \frac{32MR^2r^2(2M-R)}{f_{2}f_{3}f^{2}_{5}} \right) \\ & - \frac{128MR^2r^2(2M-R)}{f_{2}f_{3}f^{2}_{5}} - \frac{12Mr^2}{f_{5}} + 6f_{1}r^2\Phi'^2(r) \\ & - 2 f_{1} + \frac{2f_{3}f_{4}\left(9M(r^2-R^2)+ 4R^3\right)}{f_{3}f^{2}_{5}-32MR^2r^2(2M-R)f^{-1}_{2}}, \end{aligned} $
(49) where
$f_{1} = \Bigg[-4 r{\cal{A}}^4(\Phi)\left( 1+ \left(\frac{2Mr^2(9M-4R)}{4R^2(2M-R)(4R-9M)} \right)^3\right)\Bigg]^{-1}, $
$f_{2} = \left(1+Mr^2(R^2(4R-9M))^{-1} \right)^{-4}, $
$f_{3} = \left(1-M(9M-4R)^{-1} \right)^4, $
$f_{4} = 3Mr^2-9MR^2+4R^3, $
$f_{5} = M(r^2-9R^2)+4R^3 . $
It is worth mentioning here that we are able to analyze the salient physical characteristics of our stellar system. In the next section, we will discuss these physical features of compact stellar configurations.
-
The physical properties of strange stars can now be analyzed in the presence of a massive scalar field along with the coupling parameter across the energy density and radial/transverse pressure components. For this purpose, we have chosen the mass of the scalar field as
$ m_\Phi = 0.3 $ , which is well-compatible with the restraint imposed by the Gravity Probe B experiment that supplies the lower bound on the mass of scalar field, such as$ m_\Phi>10^{-4} $ in dimensionless units [37, 43]. Numerical stellar solutions have been obtained for$\omega_{\rm BD} = 05,\; $ $ 10,\; 15,\; 20,\; 25,\; 50$ which are in agreement with the restraints imposed by the solar system observations [43]. The massive scalar field is determined by solving the wave equation (13) numerically with the initial conditions$ \Phi(0) = \Phi_c = $ constant and$ \Phi'(0) = 0 $ . In this regard, the numerical solution of the wave equation (13) is well fitted (see Fig. 13) with the analytic solution given by Bruckman and Kazes [42] by relying upon the relationship between Φ and$ g_{tt} $ for static spherically symmetric space-time, asFigure 13. (color online) The scalar field
$\Phi(r)$ is plotted against radial coordinate, r, by taking the values of a, b, A, and B as shown in Table 3 for five strange stars viz., PSR J1416-2230, PSR J1903+327, 4U 1820-30, Cen X-3, and EXO 1785-248.$ \Phi(r) = a{\rm Exp}[b\eta(r)], $
(50) where a and b are two arbitrary constants. In this scenario, Maurya and his colleagues [44] were the first explorers who applied this functional form of the scalar field Φ to find precise answers to charged compact astrophysical objects by investigating new spherically symmetrical solutions of Einstein’s field equations in the background of BD gravity. In the same theory, the authors [45] have explored the existence of a new family of uncharged compact stellar configuration solutions by employing the same functional form of the scalar field Φ for an anisotropic source of fluid. The values of a and b coming from the functional form of the scalar field expressed in (50) depend on the boundary conditions imposed on the scalar field Φ, viz.,
$ \Phi(0) = \Phi_c $ ,$ \Phi'(0) = 0 $ , which are represented in Table 3 to find out the physical parameters of the compact stellar configurations. The constant$ \Phi_c $ with respect to the selected values of the parameters$m_{\Phi},\; \omega_{\rm BD}$ , and$ {\cal{B}} $ are presented in Table 1. The subscripts c and s denote that the quantity has been computed at the center and surface of the stellar configuration, respectively. All forthcoming stellar results have been illustrated graphically for U 1820-30 ($M = $ $ 1.58\pm0.06M_{\bigodot}$ [46]).Strange stars a b A B C D PSR J1416-2230 0.29990070 –0.00059001 0.000324163 0.570736 1.70428 575.734 PSR J1903+327 0.29984981 -0.00058022 0.000947973 0.421993 1.53837 240.347 4U 1820-30 0.29985855 –0.00067321 0.000856794 0.496212 1.62754 239.259 Cen X-3 0.29989402 –0.00057885 0.000668899 0.542872 1.67689 288.619 EXO 1785-248 0.29990301 –0.00057609 0.000700616 0.570341 1.70390 266.507 Table 3. Derived values of constants due to the different strange star candidates for
$m_{\phi}=0.3$ ,${\phi}_c=0.3\; \omega_{\rm BD}=20$ and${\cal{B}}= $ $ 75.007\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ .Values of $\omega_{\rm BD}$ Values of $\phi_c$ Predicted radius $\rm /Km$ ${\rho}^{\rm eff}_c /\rm (gm/{cm}^3)$ ${\rho}^{\rm eff}_s/\rm (gm/{cm}^3)$ $p_c /\rm (dyne/{cm}^2)$ $\dfrac{2M}{R}$ $Z_s$ 05 0.281 $8.458 ^{+0.271}_{-0.290}$ $3.92059 \times 10^{14}$ $3.16144 \times 10^{14}$ $7.05291 \times 10^{34}$ 0.267014 0.180115 10 0.298 $9.701 ^{+0.272}_{-0.281}$ 3.9855 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.20731 $\times 10^{14}$ $7.3361 \times 10^{34}$ 0.325797 0.239089 15 0.312 $10.059 ^{+0.253}_{-0.273}$ 4.0186 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.23069 $\times 10^{14}$ $7.48043 \times 10^{34}$ 0.342399 0.257771 20 0.324 $10.424 ^{+0.245}_{-0.262}$ 4.03955 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.24549 $\times 10^{14}$ $7.57179 \times 10^{34}$ 0.359097 0.277615 25 0.337 $10.972 ^{+0.231}_{-0.250}$ 4.05434 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.25595 $\times 10^{14}$ $7.6363 \times 10^{34}$ 0.383656 0.308943 50 0.351 $11.381 ^{+0.223}_{-0.235}$ 4.09264 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.28301 $\times 10^{14}$ $7.80339 \times 10^{34}$ 0.401531 0.333542 Table 1. Physical parameters of
$4U~1820-30$ with$m_{\phi}$ and${\cal{B}}=75.007 \;\rm MeV/fm^3$ for different values of$\omega_{\rm BD}$ . -
For a physically valid stellar solution, the gravitational potential functions should be positive and well-comported everywhere inside the stellar configurations to guarantee a singularity-free geometry [47]. The metric potentials are displayed in Fig. 1, which reveal that both gravitational potential functions are positive, regular and monotonically increasing functions of the radial coordinate leading to a singularity free system.
-
The physical variables such as energy density and pressure play an important role in determining the comportment of highly dense strange stellar configurations. The comportment of these matter variables against the radial coordinate should be positive and decrease monotonically towards the stellar surface. Figs. 2 and 3 reveal that the state determinants are maximum at the center which exhibits that the core of compact configuration is highly concentrated and decrease away from it for the selected values of the parameters
$ m_\Phi $ ,$\omega_{\rm BD}$ , and$ {\cal{B}} $ . Hence, for the chosen values of the bag constant viz.,$ {\cal{B}} $ , the existence of quark stellar structures is guaranteed for$ {\cal{L}}(\Phi) = $ $ \dfrac{1}{2}m_{\Phi}^2\Phi^2 $ . -
The presence of radial and tangential components of pressure leads to anisotropy inside the stellar system. The pressure anisotropy, measured as
$ \Delta = p_t-p_r $ , is positive when the transverse pressure exceeds the radial pressure i.e.,$ p_t>p_r $ or$ \Delta>0 $ and negative otherwise, i.e., when$ p_t<p_r $ or$ \Delta<0 $ . In addition, the particles are tightly clustered jointly in dense stellar configurations which restricts the particles' motion in the radial direction. Therefore, the radial force or pressure is less than the transverse force prompting a positive anisotropy. Along these lines, the positive anisotropy produces an outward repulsive force increasing the stability and compactness of the stellar configurations stabilizing the system against gravity. Using Eqs. (48) and (49), we obtain the anisotropy in the following form$ \begin{aligned}[b] \Delta =& \frac{1}{{\cal{A}}^4(\Phi)\left(f_{3}f^{2}_{5} - 32MR^2r^2(2M-R)f^{2}_{1}\right)^2}\\ & \times \Big[4M^2r^2(-f_{3}f_{5}-8R^2(2M-R)f^{2}_{1})(-2f_{3}f^{2}_{5} \\& - 32R^2 (2M-R)f^{2}_{1} + 2f_{3}f^{2}_{5}\Phi'^2(r)(f_{3}f^{2}_{5} \\& - 32MR^2r^2(2M-R)f^{2}_{1}))\Big]. \end{aligned} $
(51) The anisotropy of the current stellar configuration, shown in Fig. 4, is positive throughout the stellar region for the chosen values of the parameters
$ m_\Phi $ ,$\omega_{\rm BD}$ , and$ {\cal{B}} $ , confirming that the selected stellar model is viable. -
The anisotropic configuration is said to be realistic or physically feasible if it complies with five energy conditions, i.e., null (NEC), weak (WEC), strong (SEC), dominant (DEC), and trace (TEC). In the arena of MBD gravity, these five constraints are evaluated in terms of following inequalities [48].
$ {\rm{NEC:}}\quad\rho\geq0,$
(52) $ {\rm{WEC:}}\quad\rho+p_r\geq0,\quad\rho+p_t\geq0,$
(53) $ {\rm{SEC:}}\quad\rho+p_r+2p_t\geq0,$
(54) $ {\rm{DEC:}}\quad\rho-p_r\geq0,\quad \rho-p_t\geq0,$
(55) $ {\rm{TEC:}}\quad\rho-p_r-2p_t\geq0.$
(56) The positive behavior of state determinants viz.,
$ \rho,\; p_r $ , and$ p_\perp $ displayed in Fig. 5 readily complies with the first three inequalities i.e., NEC, WEC, and SEC. The graphs corresponding to DEC and TEC in Fig. 5 exhibit that DEC and TEC are positive at each point throughout the stellar configuration. Consequently, all energy bounds are fulfilled which confirm the stellar system for the considered values of$ m_\Phi,\; {\cal{B}} $ , and$\omega_{\rm BD}$ . -
Size and gravitational mass are two inter-related observable features that establish the structure and compactness of compact stellar configurations. The effective mass of a stellar configuration is measured in terms of radius across Misner-Sharp definition as
$ \begin{aligned}[b] m(r) =& \frac{1}{2}r\Bigg[1-R^2\left(4R-9M\right)\Big[8Mr^2\left(1-\frac{M}{(9M-4R)}\right)^{-3}\\& \times \left(1+\frac{Mr^2}{R^2(4R-9M)}\right)^{2}+R^2(4R-9M)\Big]^{-1}\Bigg], \end{aligned} $
(57) which is subject to the radius of stellar configuration. Fig. 6 show that the gravitational mass is a monotonically increasing function with the radial coordinate and positive throughout the stellar configuration. In addition, the regularity at the center of the celestial body is confirmed for all chosen values of the parameters
$ m_\Phi,\; {\cal{B}} $ , and$\omega_{\rm BD}$ . The compactness function is the ratio of mass to radius given asFigure 6. (color online) The mass function is plotted against radial coordinate, r for different experimental statistics of compact stars.
$ \begin{aligned}[b] u(r) =& \frac{m(r)}{r} = \frac{1}{2}\Bigg[1-R^2\left(4R-9M\right)\Big[8Mr^2\left(1-\frac{M}{(9M-4R)}\right)^{-3}\\ & \times \left(1+\frac{Mr^2}{R^2(4R-9M)}\right)^{2}+R^2(4R-9M)\Big]^{-1}\Bigg], \end{aligned} $
(58) which must be less than 0.444 as proposed by Buchdal [49] to ensure the stability of a compact cosmic body. The maximum value of the compactness function at the stellar surface is shown in Tables 1 and 2. In Fig. 7, we show that the anisotropic stellar model satisfies the required criterion i.e., adheres to the upper limit
$ \dfrac{m}{R}<\dfrac{4}{9} $ , suggested by Buchdal [49] for all chosen values of$ m_\Phi,\; {\cal{B}} $ , and$\omega_{\rm BD}$ . Moreover, under the effect of the gravitational field of a cosmic body, the electromagnetic radiation forfeits part of its energy via an increase in its wavelength, i.e., the radiation is red-shifted. The influence of the gravitational force can be measured from the X-ray spectrum of the stellar configuration utilizing the compactness factor through a gravitational red-shift parameter indicated asStrange stars Observed mass $/M_{\odot}$ Predicted radius /km ${\rho}^{\rm eff}_c/\rm (gm/{cm}^3)$ ${\rho}^{\rm eff}_s /\rm (gm/{cm}^3)$ $p_c /\rm (dyne/{cm}^2)$ $\dfrac{2M}{R} $ $Z_s$ PSR J1416-2230 1.908±0.04[57] $11.589^{+0.241}_{-0.262}$ $4.41585 \times 10^{14}$ $3.35559 \times 10^{14}$ $4.65545 \times 10^{34}$ 0.315046 0.238527 PSR J1903+327 1.667 ±0.021[58] $10.948^{+0.042}_{-0.053}$ 4.02739 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.18909 $\times 10^{14}$ 6.22257 $\times 10^{34}$ 0.303465 0.225854 4U 1820-30 1.58 ±0.06[59] $10.713^{+0.123}_{-0.134}$ 3.92059 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.13871 $\times 10^{14}$ 7.05291 $\times 10^{34}$ 0.297835 0.219853 Cen X-3 1.49 ±0.08[60] $10.483^{+0.171}_{-0.180}$ 3.81935 $\times 10^{14}$ 3.08859 $\times 10^{14}$ 8.05473 $\times 10^{34}$ 0.291452 0.213172 EXO 1785-248 1.3 ±0.2[61] $10.195^{+0.475}_{-0.535}$ 3.62795 $\times 10^{14}$ 2.98667 $\times 10^{14}$ 1.07471 $\times 10^{35}$ 0.276186 0.197693 Table 2. Physical parameters of the observed strange stars for
$m_{\phi}=0.3$ ,${\phi}_c=0.3$ ,$\omega_{\rm BD}=15$ , and${\cal{B}}=70\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ .Figure 7. (color online) The compactness function is plotted against radial coordinate, r for different experimental statistics of compact stars.
$ Z = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2u(r)}}-1, $
(59) leading to the following explicit form
$ \begin{aligned}[b] Z =& \Bigg[R^2\left(4R-9M\right)\\ & \times \Big[R^2(4R-9M) + 8Mr^2\left(1-\frac{M}{(9M-4R)}\right)^{-3}\\ & \times \left(1+\frac{Mr^2}{R^2(4R-9M)}\right)^{2}\Big]^{-1}\Bigg]^{-1/2}-1. \end{aligned} $
(60) Figure 8 demonstrates the gravitational red-shift as an increasing function with respect to radial coordinate. Notably, the surface red-shift for the celestial candidate is in good agreement with the limit for relativistic cosmic objects viz.,
$ Z<5.211 $ [50]. -
In this section, we study the stability of the anisotropic cosmic configuration. It is crucial for a stable anisotropic system that the propagation rate of sound waves traveling via an anisotropic fluid distribution should be less than that of electromagnetic radiation, i.e.,
$ 0<v_r^2<1 $ and$ 0<v_\perp^2<1 $ , where$ v_r $ and$ v_\perp $ are the components of sound speed expressed, respectively, as$ v_r^2 = \frac{{\rm d}p_r}{{\rm d}\rho},\quad v_\perp^2 = \frac{{\rm d}p_\perp}{{\rm d}\rho}. $
(61) This criterion is known as the causality condition [51] and is employed to examine the stability of the stellar system. The stability of a stellar model may also be examined via Herrera's cracking concept [52]. Cracking is produced when inward-directed radial forces of a perturbed stellar model alter the direction for a certain value of radial coordinates. Regarding this approach, the spherical cosmic body is potentially stable if it adheres to Herrera's cracking criterion indicated as
$ 0<|v_\perp^2-v_r^2|<1 $ . One of the intriguing characteristics of this scheme is that cracking is carefully linked to changes in local anisotropy. Figs. 9, 10, and 11 show that anisotropic distribution is in good concurrence with the causality condition as well as the cracking concept in the background of MBD theory.Figure 9. (color online) Variation of radial speed of sound for 4U 1820-30 plotted against radial coordinate, r by taking
$\Phi_c = 0.3,\; m_\phi = 0.3,\; {\cal{B}} = 75.007\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ with different values of$\omega_{\rm BD}$ .Figure 10. (color online) Variation of tangential speed of sound for 4U 1820-30 plotted against radial coordinate, r by taking
$\Phi_c = 0.3,\; m_\phi = 0.3,\; {\cal{B}} = 75.007\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ with different values of$\omega_{\rm BD}$ .Figure 11. (color online) Variation of
$v_t^2 - v_r^2\;\& \;v_r^2 - v_t^2$ for 4U 1820-30 plotted against radial coordinate, r by taking$\Phi_c = 0.3,\; m_\phi = 0.3,\; {\cal{B}} = 75.007\;\rm MeV/fm^3$ with different values of$\omega_{\rm BD}$ .The adiabatic index is also another widely employed tool to check the stability of relativistic stellar systems. Chandrasekhar [53, 54, 55] investigated the dynamical stability of relativistic stellar structures versus infinitesimal radial adiabatic perturbation. Heintzmann and Hillebrandt [56] established that an anisotropic compact cosmic body will reach stability if the adiabatic index is greater than
$ \dfrac{4}{3} $ at each point within the stellar object. Moreover, if an increase in density generates an effective increase in pressure, the stellar system obeys a stiff EoS. A stellar geometry connected with a stiff EoS is harder to squeeze and more stable in contrast with a stellar configuration with a soft EoS. The EoS stiffness is evaluated through the adiabatic index given as$ \Gamma = \frac{p_r+\rho}{p_r}\frac{{\rm d}p_r}{{\rm d}\rho} = \frac{p_r+\rho}{p_r}v_r^2. $
(62) The value of this adiabatic index is more than
$ \frac{4}{3} $ for all considered values of the parameters$ m_\Phi,\; {\cal{B}} $ and$\omega_{\rm BD}$ which is in good accordance with the restraint [56]. Hence, the stellar configuration is potentially stable for the chosen values of MBD parameters.Finally, we verified the stability conditions for the prototype anisotropic celestial system employing three approaches: causality condition, Herrera's cracking approach, and adiabatic index. All these criteria imply the stability of the stellar model coupled to a massive scalar field.
Exploring physical features of anisotropic quark stars in Brans-Dicke theory with a massive scalar field via embedding approach
- Received Date: 2021-11-07
- Available Online: 2022-04-15
Abstract: The main aim of this study is to explore the existence and salient features of spherically symmetric relativistic quark stars in the background of massive Brans-Dicke gravity. The exact solutions to the modified Einstein field equations are derived for specific forms of coupling and scalar field functions using the equation of state relating to the strange quark matter that stimulates the phenomenological MIT-Bag model as a free Fermi gas of quarks. We use a well-behaved function along with the Karmarkar condition for class-one embedding as well as junction conditions to determine the unknown metric tensors. The radii of strange compact stars viz., PSR J1416-2230, PSR J1903+327, 4U 1820-30, CenX-3, and EXO1785-248, are predicted via their observed mass for different values of the massive Brans-Dicke parameters. We explore the influences of the mass of scalar field