-
In the past two decades, a large number of new hadronic states have been observed by large-scale scientific facilities, several of which cannot be categorized as conventional mesons or baryons. The states that do not meet the expectations of conventional hadrons in the quark model are known as exotic states. Theorists have conducted numerous studies in an attempt to explain the mysterious properties of these exotica. The experimental and theoretical effort required makes the study of these exotic states an intriguing field in hardonic physics. These achievements and progresses provide good opportunities for us to investigate the internal structures of exotica, and recent experimental and theoretical statuses can be found in reviews [1–10].
Among the new hadronic states, charmonium-like states are particularly fascinating and attract wide attention both experimentally and theoretically. Various approaches have been adopted to study their properties, including phenomenological quark models, effective field theories, QCD sum rules, and lattice QCD, and several different interpretations have been proposed to reveal their natures, such as compact tetraquarks, meson-meson molecular states, conventional charmonia, hybrid states, and kinematic effects. These investigations on charmonium-like states covered masses, decay behaviors, production processes, and magnetic moments. Although previous studies have not provided a unified explanation, it is essential to explore every aspect of these states with different configurations because this can help us to better understand them and search for additional undetected particles.
Besides mass spectra and production, strong decay behaviors reflect the internal structures of charmonium-like states and hence have been attracting increasing attention. In literature, two-meson decay channels have been widely studied [11–23]. For molecular states, these decays usually occur through meson exchange processes, and the fall-apart mechanism is generally assumed to estimate the partial decay widths of compact tetraquarks. Moreover, a charmonium-like state can decay into one light meson plus one charmonium-like state, and yet there are few studies on this type of decay. Under the molecular hypothesis, the authors calculated the processes using the effective Lagrangian approach [24, 25]. However, these processes have not been investigated within compact tetraquark configurations. In fact, the light meson emissions of these
XYZ states not only help us distinguish between compact tetraquarks and loosely bound molecules, but also play an essential role as the connecting bridges between different charmonium-like states. Hence, it is important to study these decay processes for charmonium-like states within compact tetraquark configurations.Experimentally, several candidates have been observed for excited compact tetraquarks. In 2016, a
JPC =0++ structureX(4700) was discovered in theB+→J/ψϕK+ decay process by the LHCb Collaboration [26, 27], which had a mass of4704±10+14−24 MeV and a width of120±31+42−33 MeV. BecauseX(4700) was found in theJ/ψϕ invariant mass, it may include both acˉc pair andsˉs pair and be regarded as a radially excitedcˉcsˉs compact tetraquark [28–31]. Another radially excited candidate is the resonanceZc(4430) , which was first observed in theB→Kπ−ϕ(2S) decay process by the Belle Collaboration in 2007 [32]. This resonance was then confirmed in the same process by the LHCb Collaboration and in theB0→K−π+J/ψ decay by the Belle Collaboration [33, 34]. Its mass and decay width were remeasured to be4478+15−18 MeV and181±31 MeV, respectively [35]. ForP -wave candidates, there have been several1−− charmonium-like states. For instance, Y(4260) was reported in the processe+e−→π+π−J/ψ by the BaBar Collaboration and subsequently confirmed by the Belle and BESIII Collaborations [36–38]. With increasing experimental data, Y(4260) was renamed Y(4230), with a mass of(4219.6±3.3±5.1) MeV and a width of(56.0±3.6±6.9) MeV, respectively [35]. Moreover, the decay branching fractionΓe+e−B[Y(4230)→π+π−hc] was measured to be(4.6+2.9−1.4±0.8) eV in theπ+π−hc channel [39]. Y(4390) was found in thee+e−→π+π−hc cross sections at approximately 4.22 and 4.39 GeV by the BESIII Collaboration [39], with a mass of4391.5+6.3−6.8±1.0 MeV and a width of139.5+16.2−20.6±0.6 MeV, respectively. This structure was also observed in thee+e−→ηJ/ψ ande+e−→π+π−D+D− processes [40, 41]. Experimental information on the otherP -wave candidatesY(4360) andY(4660) can be found in [38, 42–49].In this study, we apply the
3P0 model to four-body systems and calculate the selected decays of the resonancesX(4700) ,Zc(4430) ,Y(4230) ,Y(4360) ,Y(4390) , andY(4660) . The final states are light mesons plusZc(3985) ,Zc(4020) ,Zcs(3900) , orZcs(4000) . According to previously theoretical and experimental studies, these charmonium-like states are good candidates of compact tetraquarks. Here, we adopt compact tetraquark configurations to investigate the decay processes among theseXYZ states. We find that the pion/kaon decay widths ofX(4700) andZc(4430) are relatively small, whereas the partial decay widths ofY(4230) ,Y(4360) ,Y(4390) , andY(4660) are significant.This paper is organized as follows: The formalism for the strong decays of compact tetraquarks in the
3P0 model is introduced in Sec. II. We present the numerical results and discussions for the selected charmonium-like states in Sec. III. Finally, a short summary is given in the last section. -
In this study, we adopt the
3P0 model to calculate the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka-allowed strong decays of compact tetraquark states. In this model, a quark-antiquark pair with the quantum numberJPC =0++ is created from vacuum and then goes into the final states [50]. This model has been widely employed to study strong decays for different types of hadronic systems with notable success [51–66]. Moreover, several previous studies adopted the formalism for compact tetraquarks [53, 67–69]. In the nonrelativistic limit, to describe the decay processA→BC for a compact tetraquark, the transition operator T in the3P0 model can be expressed as [58, 62–66]T=−3γ∑m⟨1m1−m|00⟩∫d3p5d3p6δ3(p5+p6)×Ym1(p5−p62)χ561,−mϕ560ω560b†5i(p5)d†6j(p6),
(1) where γ is the dimensionless
q5ˉq6 quark pair production strength, andp5 andp6 are the momenta of the created quarkq5 and antiquarkˉq6 , respectively. Here, i and j are the color indices of the created quark and antiquark,ϕ560=(uˉu+dˉd+sˉs)/√3 ,ω56=δij , andχ561,−m are the flavor singlet, color singlet, and spin triplet wave functions of the quark-antiquark pair, respectively.Ym1(p)≡|p|Ym1(θp,ϕp) is the solid harmonic polynomial reflecting theP− wave momentum-space distribution of theq5ˉq6 pair.There are five possible rearrangements of the strong decays of the compact tetraquarks
cqˉcˉq :A(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq4)+P(q5,ˉq6)→B(q2,q5,ˉc3,ˉq4)+C(c1,ˉq6),
(2) A(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq4)+P(q5,ˉq6)→B(c1,q5,ˉc3,ˉq4)+C(q2,ˉq6),
(3) A(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq4)+P(q5,ˉq6)→B(c1,q2,ˉq4,ˉq6)+C(q5,ˉc3),
(4) A(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq4)+P(q5,ˉq6)→B(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq6)+C(q5,ˉq4),
(5) A(c1,q2,ˉc3,ˉq4)+P(q5,ˉq6)→B(c1,q2,q5)+C(ˉc3,ˉq4,ˉq6).
(6) In Fig. 1, we present all possible rearrangements, that is, charmed(-strange) meson emissions, light meson emissions, and baryon-antibaryon processes. Owing to the limited phase space of the selected charmonium-like states, we only focus on light meson emissions in this study.
Figure 1. Five possible rearrangements. (a) and (c) are charmed(-strange) meson emissions, (b) and (d) are light meson emissions, and (e) represents the baryon and anti-baryon decay modes.
To investigate the strong decay behaviors of compact tetraquarks, we present the Jacobi coordinates in Fig. 2. Here,
c1 andq2 denote quarks, andˉc3 andˉq4 correspond to antiquarks.ρ1=r1−r2 is the relative coordinates between two quarks,ρ2=r3−r4 is the relative coordinates between two antiquarks, andλ=m1r1+m2r2m1+m2−m3r3+m4r4m3+m4 represents the relative coordinates between quarks and antiquarks. With this definition, we can classify the excitations of compact tetraquarks into three types:ρ1− mode,ρ2− mode, andλ− mode. Empirically, the observations forρ− mode excitations are scarce for heavy-light systems. For instance, most observed singly heavy baryons in experiments can be assigned as λ-mode excitations, and noρ− mode heavy baryon has previously been confirmed. In this study, we only consider λ-mode excitations for the initial states, that is,nρA1=lρA1=nρA2=lρA2=0 andLA=LλA . Furthermore, owing to phase space constraints, all the final states are ground states.With the transition operator T, the helicity amplitude
MMJAMJBMJC is defined as⟨BC|T|A⟩=δ3(PA−PB−PC)MMJAMJBMJC.
(7) Here, we take the diagram (d) in Fig. 1 as an example. Similar to the strong decays of conventional hadrons [58, 62–66], the explicit formula of the helicity amplitude
MMJAMJBMJC can be expressed asMMJAMJBMJC=−γ√8EAEBEC∑MLA∑MS1∑MS2∑MS3∑MS4∑m×⟨S1MS1S2MS2|S12MS12⟩⟨S3MS3S4MS4|S34MS34⟩×⟨S12MS12S34MS34|SAMSA⟩×⟨LAMLASAMSA|JAMJA⟩×⟨S1MS1S2|MS2S12MS12⟩×⟨S3MS3S6MS6|S36MS36⟩×⟨S12MS12S36MS36|JBMJB⟩×⟨S4MS4S5MS5|JCMJC⟩×⟨S5MS5S6MS6|1−m⟩×⟨1m1−m|00⟩×⟨ϕ1236Bϕ45C|ϕ1234Aϕ560⟩IMLAmMLBMLC(p),
(8) where
⟨ϕ1236Bϕ45C|ϕ1234Aϕ560⟩ is the overlap of the flavor wave functions.IMLAmMLBMLC(p) represents the spatial overlaps of initial and final states, and relevant analytical expressions are listed in the appendix. The decay widthΓ(A→BC) can then be calculated directly,Γ=π2pM2A12JA+1∑MJA,MJB,MJC|MMJAMJBMJC|2,
(9) where
p=|p|=√[M2A−(MB+MC)2][M2A−(MB−MC)2]2MA , andMA ,MB , andMC are the masses of the hadrons A, B, and C, respectively.In the
3P0 model, we require the quark pair creation strength γ, harmonic oscillator parameters in the orbital wave functions of the initial and final states, and different types of quark masses to calculate the decays numerically. In literature,γ=0.4×√96π andα=0.4GeV are widely used to investigate the strong decays of conventional mesons [60], where the factor√96π originates from different conventions. For conventional baryons,α=0.4/√2 GeV is commonly adopted, where√2 originates from the different definitions of the relative coordinates [70–74]. In compact tetraquarks, there is no experimental information to restrict these parameters via the known decay processes. In thecqˉcˉq states, theρ1 andρ2 modes are similar to the excitations of conventional baryons, whereas the λ mode is analogous to conventional meson systems. Thus, we adoptαρ1 =αρ2 =0.4/√2 GeV andαλ=0.4 GeV for the compactcqˉcˉq states,α= 0.4 GeV for light mesons, andγ=0.4×√96π for the overall strength. Moreover, the quark massesmu/d =0.22 GeV,ms =0.418 GeV, andmc =1.628 GeV are employed in the calculations [60, 75, 76]. Here, we adopt as few parameters as possible to semi-quantitatively estimate the strong decays ofcqˉcˉq tetraquarks and provide theoretical information for future explorations.In this study, we investigate the decay behaviors of the charmonium-like states
X(4700) ,Zc(4430) ,Y(4230) ,Y(4360) ,Y(4390) , andY(4660) . Combining experimental data and theoretical information, we tentatively regardX(4700) as acsˉcˉs(2S) state;Zc(4430) as acqˉcˉq(2S) state;Y(4230) ,Y(4360) ,Y(4390) , andY(4660) ascqˉcˉq(1P) states; andY(4660) as acsˉcˉs(1P) state. The possible quantum numbers of these states are listed in Table 1. Here, in the notationχS12S34S ,S12 ,S34 , and S represent the spin ofc1q2 , spin ofˉc3ˉq4 , and total spin, respectively. The explicit expressions ofχS12S34S are as follows:State JPC nλ Lλ Spin Candidate XSSS 0++ 1 0 χ000 X(4700) XAAS 0++ 1 0 χ110 YSSS 1^{–} 0 1 \chi^{00}_{0} \left(\begin{array}{c} Y(4660)\\ Y(4230)\\ Y(4360)\\ Y(4390) \end{array} \right) Y^{AA}_S 1^{–} 0 1 \chi^{11}_{0} Y^{AA}_T 1^{–} 0 1 \chi^{11}_{2} Y^{AS}_A 1^{–} 0 1 \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(\chi^{10}_{1}+\chi^{01}_{1}) Z^{AS}_A 1^{+-} 1 0 (\chi^{10}_{1}-\chi^{01}_{1})/\sqrt{2} Z_c(4430) Z^{AA}_A 1^{+-} 1 0 \chi^{11}_{1} Table 1. Notations and quantum numbers of the initial states. The superscripts and subscripts S, A, and T in the states correspond to spins 0, 1, and 2, respectively.
\chi^{00}_0={|{(c_1 q_2)}_0{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_0\rangle} _0,
(10) \chi^{11}_0={|{(c_1 q_2)}_1{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_1\rangle} _0,
(11) \chi^{01}_1={|{(c_1 q_2)}_0{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_1\rangle} _1,
(12) \chi^{10}_1={|{(c_1 q_2)}_1{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_0\rangle} _1,
(13) \chi^{11}_1={|{(c_1 q_2)}_1{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_1\rangle} _1,
(14) \chi^{11}_2={|{(c_1 q_2)}_1{(\bar c_3 \bar q_4)}_1\rangle} _2.
(15) Furthermore,
Z_c(3985) ,Z_c(4020) ,Z_{cs}(3900) , andZ_{cs}(4000) are assumed to be the ground states of compact tetraquarks, which are allJ^{P(C)}= 1^{+(-)} resonances. Under these assignments, theZ_c(3900) andZ_{cs}(3985) resonances have the spin wave function(\chi^{10}_{1}-\chi^{01}_{1})/\sqrt{2} , and the spin wave function for theZ_c(4020) andZ_{cs}(4000) resonances is\chi^{11}_{1} . -
In literature, the
X(4700) resonance is usually explained as a radially excited compactcs \bar c \bar s tetraquark,P -wave conventional charmonium,D- wavecs \bar c \bar s tetraquark state, or ground tetraquark state [28–31, 77–80]. In the constituent quark model, there are two λ-model0^{++}\; cs \bar c \bar s states, which are predicted to be close to each other. The partial decay widths of theZ_{cs}(3985) K andZ_{cs}(4000) K channels are estimated and listed in Table 2. All of these partial widths are relatively small, which suggests that the fall-apart process with two meson final states may dominate. The small partial decay widths of theX(4700) resonance may be caused by the radial2 S excitations andP -wave suppression of the decay amplitude. Although the predicted partial decay widths are small, these decay channels have the opportunity to be observed in future experiments. Moreover, we find that theZ_{cs}(4000) K decay mode is forbidden at the tree level under theX^{SS}_S assignment, and this selection rule is independent of the parameters of the quark pair creation model.Decay mode X(4700) X^{SS}_S X^{AA}_S Z_{cs}(3985) K 0.25 0.08 Z_{cs}(4000) K 0 0.12 Total 0.25 0.20 Table 2. Predictions of the
X(4700) \rightarrow Z_{cs}(3985)/Z_{cs}(4000) K processes in MeV.Recently, the LHCb Collaboration observed a new resonance
X(4740) in theJ/\psi \phi mass spectrum [81, 82], which is probably the same state asX(4700) . This resonance may be explained as another radially excited compact0^{++} \; cs \bar c \bar s tetraquark, or even a2^{++} tetraquark. We plot the mass dependence of the partial decay widths of two0^{++} states in Fig. 3. As shown, the total widths of theZ_{cs}(3985) K andZ_{cs}(4000) K channels remain small when the mass varies from 4700 to 4750 MeV. We hope that these estimations can provide a valuable clue to better understand the resonancesX(4700) andX(4740) , and more theoretical and experimental efforts are required to reveal the relationship between observed resonances and predicted states in the quark model. -
In the constituent quark model, two
\lambda -model1^{+-} radially excited compactcn \bar c \bar n tetraquarks lie at approximately 4.5 GeV. With these two assignments, the partial decay widths ofZ_c(4430) are calculated and presented in Table 3. Similar to theX(4700) case, these partial decay widths are also small owing to radial excitations. Usually, decay behaviors can help distinguish different assignments for a new hadronic state. However, for the resonanceZ_c(4430) under two1^{+-} assignments, its decays exhibit the same behaviors. This situation can be understood via the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient in the helicity amplitudes. Although these two assignments have different quantum numbers, the helicity amplitudes are found to be the same after tedious calculations. Because of the small partial decay widths and same decay behaviors, other decay channels may be more suitable for clarifying the nature ofZ_c(4430) .Decay mode Z_c(4430) Z^{AS}_A Z^{AA}_A Z_{c}(3900) \pi 2.72\times 10^{-3} 2.72\times 10^{-3} Z_{c}(4020) \pi 8.60\times 10^{-2} 8.60\times 10^{-2} Total 8.87\times 10^{-2} 8.87\times 10^{-2} Table 3. Theoretical predictions of the strong decays of the
Z_c(4430) states in MeV.Decay mode Y(4360) Y^{SS}_S Y^{AA}_S Y^{AA}_T Y^{AS}_A Z_{c}(3900) \pi 4.73 1.20 0.11 1.20 Z_{c}(4020) \pi 0 0.64 0.68 0.64 Total 4.73 1.84 0.79 1.84 Table 5. Theoretical predictions of the strong decays of the Y(4360) states in MeV.
-
For
\lambda -modelP -wave excitations, there are four1^{--} \; cn \bar c \bar n compact tetraquarks in the constituent quark model. We tentatively assignY(4230) ,Y(4360) , andY(4390) as these configurations and calculate the partial decay widths of theZ_{c}(3900) \pi andZ_{c}(4020) \pi channels. The results are presented in Tables 4 to 6. The partial decay widths are predicted to be approximately0.11 \sim 5.64 MeV, except in the forbidden channels, which are significant enough to be tested in forthcoming experiments. Moreover, theY^{AA}_S andY^{AS}_A assignments exhibit the same decay behaviors for pion emissions.Decay mode Y(4230) Y^{SS}_S Y^{AA}_S Y^{AA}_T Y^{AS}_A Z_{c}(3900) \pi 1.27 0.65 0.76 0.65 Z_{c}(4020) \pi 0 0.58 0.96 0.58 Total 1.27 1.23 1.72 1.23 Table 4. Theoretical predictions of the strong decays of the Y(4230) states in MeV.
Decay mode Y(4390) Y^{SS}_S Y^{AA}_S Y^{AA}_T Y^{AS}_A Z_{c}(3900) \pi 5.64 1.47 0.22 1.47 Z_{c}(4020) \pi 0 0.63 0.50 0.63 Total 5.64 2.10 0.72 2.10 Table 6. Theoretical predictions of the strong decays of the Y(4390) states in MeV.
In Ref. [83], the authors calculated the process
Y(4230) \to Z_{c}(3900) \pi in the tetraquark scheme with the quark-pion axial vector interaction and obtained an8 ^{+10}_{-4} MeV partial decay width. When we adopt the same assignment, our result is 0.76 MeV, which is different from theirs. Under theD\bar D_1 (2420) + H.c. . molecular scenario, we also investigate the decayY(4230) \to Z_{c}(3900) \pi using an effective Lagrangian approach [25] and obtain a width of3.15\pm0.45 MeV. For theY(4390) resonance, theD^* \bar D_1 + H.c. molecular interpretation is also popular in literature. In a previous study [24], the partial decay width of the\pi^{+} \pi^{-} h_{c} process was estimated to be 0.74 to 0.85 MeV with an effective Lagrangian approach. By subducting the branch ratio, one can obtain the width of theY(4390) \to Z_{c}(4020) \pi process as approximately 10 MeV, which is also larger than the present results under compact tetraquark configurations. It should be emphasized thatY(4390) \to Z_c(3900)\pi is significant under compact tetraquark configurations, whereas theZc(3900)\pi mode should be suppressed for theD^* \bar{D}_1 + H.c. molecular interpretation [24]. Thus, theY(4390) \to Z_c(3900)\pi channel can help discriminate the nature ofY(4390) andZ_c(3900) . More precise theoretical calculations and experimental information are required to clarify their internal structures. -
Y(4660) is a good candidate of P-wavec s \bar c \bar s compact tetraquarks. This state is divided into two structures,Y(4660) andY(4630) ; however, several studies have indicated thatY(4630) should be the same structure asY(4660) [84–87]. Here, we follow the assignment of the Review of Particle Physics, which suggests that only one resonanceY(4660) exists in this energy region [35]. The calculated partial decay widths are shown in Table 7. These partial decay widths are significant, and the decay behaviors are similar to those of their non-strange partnersY(4230) ,Y(4360) , andY(4390) . Compared with the total width62 ^{+9}_{-7} MeV, the total branch ratios of theZ_{cs}(3985) K andZ_{cs}(4000) K channels are approximately0.06 \sim 0.14 , which can be tested in future experiments.Decay mode Y(4660) Y^{SS}_S Y^{AA}_S Y^{AA}_T Y^{AS}_A Z_{cs}(3985) K 8.81 2.78 1.42 2.78 Z_{cs}(4000) K 0 2.89 2.46 2.89 Total 8.81 5.67 3.88 5.67 Table 7. Theoretical predictions of the strong decays of the Y(4660) states in MeV.
-
Our present calculations are based on the resonances
Z_c(3900) /Z_{cs}(3985) with a spin structure of(\chi^{10}_{1}-\chi^{01}_{1})/\sqrt{2} , andZ_c(4020) andZ_{cs}(4000) with a spin structure of\chi^{11}_{1} . This is the normal mass hierarchy forJ^{P(C)}= 1^{+(-)} compact tetraquarks. However, these spin structures may be inversed in realistic calculations, that is,Z_c(3900) /Z_{cs}(3985) with\chi^{11}_{1} , andZ_c(4020) /Z_{cs}(4000) with(\chi^{10}_{1}-\chi^{01}_{1})/\sqrt{2} . Fortunately, because of the nearly equal masses of these states, this does not change the results significantly.In the constituent quark model, the commonly used interaction is the Cornell potential, which can reproduce the low-lying spectra of heavy quarkonium well. With realistic wave functions, one can obtain the effective αs predicted to be approximately 400 MeV. Considering the similarity between λ-mode compact tetraquarks and charmonia, we expect that the mass pattern and hierarchy can be reproduced. Indeed, several previous studies [29, 80] based on the diquark-antiquark pictures have revealed masses and αs in these ranges, and the experimental data of charmonia also support the mass differences of compact tetraquarks. We investigate the dependence on the harmonic oscillator parameter
\alpha_\lambda forY(4230) andY(4390) by fixing the relation\alpha_\lambda = \sqrt{2} \alpha_\rho in Fig. 4. When\alpha_\lambda varies in the large reasonable range300 \sim 500 MeV, the decay widths exhibit some changes, but our conclusions remain the same.Figure 4. (color online) Dependence on the harmonic oscillator parameter
\alpha_\lambda forY(4230) andY(4390) .Here, we apply the quark pair creation model to study the decay behaviors of compact tetraquarks in an attempt to estimate the light meson emissions of charmonium-like states. There are a few investigations on light meson emissions among compact tetraquarks, both theoretically and experimentally. However, this type of process is important for studying the relationships of compact tetraquarks and requires more attention in future.
-
In this study, we adopt the
^3P_0 model to investigate the light meson emissions of the charmonium-like statesX(4700) ,Z_c(4430) ,Y(4230) ,Y(4360) ,Y(4390) , andY(4660) under compact tetraquark configurations. We find that the pion/kaon decay widths of the radially excited states are relatively small, whereas the partial decay widths of P-wave excitations are significant. Based on our calculations, we expect that theY(4390) \to Z_c(3900)/Z_c(4020)\pi decay channels are more likely to be measured by the BESIII and Belle II Collaborations, which can provide valuable information to clarify the nature ofY(4390) ,Z_c(3900) , andZ_c(4020) .Our present calculations are preliminary. Here, we employ a widely accepted approach and relevant parameters to semi-quantitatively estimate the magnitudes of transitions between these charmonium-like states. Current theoretical results and experimental data are not sufficient to give definitive interpretations. We hope that our preliminary explorations can provide information for further research, and more theoretical and experimental studies are encouraged to further discuss this topic.
-
We would like to thank Xian-Hui Zhong and Rui Chen for valuable discussions.
-
Harmonic oscillator wave functions for compact tetraquarks in the momentum representation can be expressed as
\begin{aligned}[b] &\psi _{n_{L}M_{L}}(n_{\rho _{1}},l_{\rho _{1}},m_{\rho _{1}},n_{\rho _{2}},l_{\rho _{2}},m_{\rho _{2}},n_{\lambda },l_{\lambda },m_{\lambda })\\=&(-1)^{n_{\rho _{1}}}(-i)^{l_{\rho _{1}}}p_{\rho _{1}}^{^{l_{\rho _{1}}}}\Bigg[ \frac{2n!}{\Gamma (n_{\rho _{1}}+l_{\rho _{1}}+\frac{3}{2})}\Bigg]^{\frac{1}{2} }\times \Bigg(\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho _{1}}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}+l_{\rho _{1}}} \\ &(-1)^{n_{\rho _{2}}}(-i)^{l_{\rho _{2}}}p_{\rho _{2}}^{^{l_{\rho _{2}}}}\Bigg[ \frac{2n!}{\Gamma (n_{\rho _{2}}+l_{\rho _{2}}+\frac{3}{2})}\Bigg]^{\frac{1}{2} }\times \Bigg(\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho _{2}}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}+l_{\rho 2}} \\ &(-1)^{n_{\rho _{\lambda }}}(-i)^{l_{\rho _{\lambda }}}p_{\rho _{\lambda }}^{^{l_{\rho _{\lambda }}}}\Bigg[\frac{2n!}{\Gamma (n_{\rho _{_{\lambda }}}+l_{\rho _{_{\lambda }}}+\frac{3}{2})}\Bigg]^{\frac{1}{2}}\times \Bigg(\frac{1}{ \alpha _{\rho _{_{\lambda }}}} \Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}+l_{\rho _{\lambda }}} \\ &Y_{l_{\rho _{1}}}^{m_{\rho _{1}}}(\vec p_{\rho _{1}}) Y_{l_{\rho _{2}}}^{m_{\rho _{2}}}(\vec p_{\rho _{2}})Y_{l_{\rho _{\lambda }}}^{m_{\rho _{\lambda }}}(\vec p_{\lambda } )L_{n_{\rho _{1}}}^{l_{\rho _{1}}+\frac{1}{2}}(p_{\rho _{1}}^{2}/\alpha _{\rho _{1}}^{2}) L_{n_{\rho _{2}}}^{l_{\rho _{2}}+\frac{1}{2}}(p_{\rho _{2}}^{2}/ \alpha _{\rho _{2}}^{2}) \\ &L_{n_\lambda }^{l_\lambda+\frac{1}{2}} (p_\lambda^2 / \alpha _\lambda ^{2}) \times \exp \Bigg(-\frac{ \vec p_{\rho _{1}}^{2}}{2\alpha _{\rho _{1}}^{2}}-\frac{ \vec p_{\rho _{2}}^{2}}{2\alpha _{\rho _{2}}^{2}}-\frac{ \vec p_{\rho _{\lambda}}^{2}}{2\alpha _{\rho _{\lambda}}^{2}}\Bigg), \end{aligned}\tag{A1}
where
\vec{p}_{\rho_1}=\frac{m_{2}\vec{p}_{1}- m_{1}\vec{p}_{2}}{m_{1}+ m_{2}}, \tag{A2}
\vec{p}_{\rho_2}=\frac{m_{4}\vec{p}_{3}- m_{3}\vec{p}_{4}}{m_{3}+ m_{4}}, \tag{A3}
\vec{p}_{\lambda}=\frac{(m_{3}+m_{4})(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2})- (m_{1}+m_{2})(\vec{p}_{3}+\vec{p}_{4})}{m_{1}+ m_{2}+ m_{3}+ m_{4}}. \tag{A4}
Similarly, the harmonic oscillator wave function for ground mesons in the momentum representation can be written as
\psi \left(0,0,0\right)=\left( \frac{1}{\pi \alpha^{2}}\right) ^{\frac{3}{4}}\exp \left( - \frac{\vec{p}_{\rm rel}^{2}}{2\alpha^{2}}\right),\tag{A5}
where
\vec{p}_{rel} represents the relative momentum between the quark and antiquark in the final mesons.In this study, all the final states are ground states, that is,
n_{\rho_{B1}}=l_{\rho_{B1}}=n_{\rho_{B2}}=l_{\rho_{B2}}=n_{\lambda_ B}=l_{\lambda_ B}=n_{C}=L_{C}=0 . More-over, we only consider λ-mode excitations for the initial states, and thenn_{\rho_{A1}}=l_{\rho_{A1}}=n_{\rho_{A2}}=l_{\rho_{A2}}=0 . Here, we denote the spatial overlap integralsI^{M_{L_A},m}_{M_{L_B},M_{L_C}}(\vec{p}) as\Pi(n_{\lambda _A}, l_{\lambda_A}, m_{\lambda_A}, m) , and the relevant formulas for the low-lying states are presented below. We definec_{1} =\frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}, \tag{A6}
c_{2} =\frac{m_{1}+m_{2}}{2m_{1}+m_{2}+m_{5}}, \tag{A7}
c_{3} =\frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{5}}, \tag{A8}
c_{4} =\frac{m_{2}}{m_{2}+m_{5}}, \tag{A9}
c_{5} =\frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}-c_{3}, \tag{A10}
\lambda _{1} =\frac{1}{\alpha _{\lambda }^{2}}+\frac{1}{2\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}c_{5}^{2}+\frac{1}{2\alpha ^{2}}c_{1}^{2}, \tag{A11}
\lambda _{2} =\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}+\frac{1}{2\alpha ^{2}}, \tag{A12}
\lambda _{3} =\frac{1}{2\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}c_{3}^{2}+\frac{1}{2\alpha _{\lambda }^{2}}c_{2}^{2}+\frac{1}{2\alpha ^{2}}c_{4}^{2}, \tag{A13}
\lambda _{4} =\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}c_{3}c_{5}-\frac{1}{\alpha _{\lambda }^{2}}c_{2}-\frac{1}{\alpha ^{2}}c_{1}c_{4}, \tag{A14}
\lambda _{5} =\frac{1}{\alpha ^{2}}c_{1}-\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}c_{5}, \tag{A15}
\lambda _{6} =-\frac{1}{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}}c_{3}-\frac{1}{\alpha ^{2}} c_{4}, \tag{A16}
f_{1} =\frac{\lambda _{5}}{2\lambda _{1}}, \tag{A17}
f_{2} =\frac{\lambda _{4}}{2\lambda _{1}}, \tag{A18}
f_{3} =\lambda _{2}-\frac{f_{1} \lambda _{5}}{2},\tag{A19}
f_{4} =\frac{\lambda _{6}-f_{2}\lambda _{5}}{2f_{3}}, \tag{A20}
f_{5} =\lambda _{3}-\frac{f_{2} \lambda _{4}}{2}-f_{4}^{2}f_{3}, \tag{A21}
and then, we can easily obtain the spatial overlap integrals,
\Pi (0,0,0,0)=\sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi }}(1+f_{4}+c_{1}f_{2}-c_{1}f_{1}f_{4}) \left\vert \vec{P}\right\vert \Delta _{00}, \tag{A22}
\begin{aligned}[b] \Pi (1,0,0,0) =&\Bigg[-2(1+f_{4}+c_{1}f_{2}-c_{1}f_{1}f_{4})(f_{2}-f_{1}f_{4})\left\vert \vec{P}\right\vert^2 \\ & -\frac{ f_{1}(c_{1}f_{1}-1)}{f_{3}}-\frac{c_{1}}{\lambda _{1}}\Bigg]\Delta _{10}^{\lambda }, \end{aligned}\tag{A23}
\Pi (0,1,1,-1) =\Pi (0,1,-1,1) =\Bigg[ \frac{f_{1}(c_{1}f_{1}-1)}{f_{3}}+\frac{c_{1}}{\lambda _{1}} \Bigg ]\Delta_{10}^{\lambda }, \tag{A24}
with
\begin{aligned}[b] \Delta _{00} =& \Bigg( \frac{1}{\pi \alpha _{\rho }^{2}} \Bigg)^{3} \Bigg(\frac{1}{\pi \alpha _{\lambda }^{2}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}} \Bigg(\frac{1}{\pi \alpha ^{2}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{4}} \Bigg(\frac{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}\pi ^{3}}{\lambda_{1}f_{3}} \Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}} \\ &\times \exp \Bigg[-\Big(f_{5}\left\vert \vec{P} \right\vert ^{2}\Big) \Bigg], \end{aligned}\tag{A25}
\begin{aligned}[b] \Delta _{10}^{\lambda } =&-i\Bigg(\frac{1}{\pi \alpha _{\rho }^{2}}\Bigg)^{3} \Bigg(\frac{ 1}{\alpha _{\lambda }}\Bigg)^{\frac{5}{2}}\Bigg(\frac{\alpha _{\rho }^{2}\pi ^{3}}{ \lambda _{1}f_{3}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}} \Bigg(\frac{1}{\pi \alpha _{\lambda }^{2}}\Bigg)^{ \frac{3}{4}}\Bigg(\frac{1}{\pi \alpha ^{2}}\Bigg)^{\frac{3}{4}} \\&\times \exp \Bigg[-\Big(f_{5}\left\vert \vec{P}\right\vert ^{2}\Big) \Bigg] \times \Bigg(\frac{8}{3\sqrt{\pi }}\Bigg)^{\frac{1}{2}}\Bigg(\frac{3}{8\pi }\Bigg). \end{aligned}\tag{A26}
Light meson emissions of selected charmonium-like states within compact tetraquark configurations
- Received Date: 2022-12-10
- Available Online: 2023-06-15
Abstract: We adopt the quark pair creation model to investigate the light meson emissions of several charmonium-like states. The quark pair creation model is applied to four-body systems, and we calculate the pion/kaon emissions of