-
The process of PbPb UPC producing η and decaying into
$A' $ is shown in Fig. 1, where the η meson is generated by the interaction of heavy-ion beam radiation. UPCs require the impact parameter of the two lead nuclei to be greater than twice the nuclear radius. In UPCs, the total cross-section of PbPb$\to $ PbPbη can be written in the well-known form from [34] with equivalent photon approximation [35]Figure 1. (color online) Feynman diagram illustrating the production of dark photons in Pb-Pb ultraperipheral collisions. The cyan shading represents the unknown details of the η decay, and
$ \omega_{1(2)} $ denotes the energy of the photon fluxes radiated by the two lead nuclei. We only consider the case where dark photons decay into electron or muon pairs.$ \begin{aligned}[b]& \sigma\left({\rm PbPb\to Pb}\otimes\eta\otimes {\rm Pb};s\right)\\ =\;&\int{\rm{d}}^2{\bf{b}}_1{\rm{d}}^2{\bf{b}}_2{\rm{d}}W{\rm{d}}y\frac W2\hat{\sigma}\left(\gamma\gamma\to\eta;W\right) \\& \times N\left(\omega_1,{\bf{b}}_1\right)N\left(\omega_2,{\bf{b}}_2\right)\theta(|{\boldsymbol{b}}_{1}-{\bf{b}}_{2}|-2R_{\rm Pb}), \end{aligned} $
(1) where
$ W=\sqrt{4\omega_1\omega_2} $ represents invariant mass of the$ \gamma\gamma $ system, and y is the rapidity of η in the final state. The photon flux energy$ \omega_{1(2)} $ is written in terms of W and y as follows:$ \omega_1=\frac W2 {\rm e}^y\quad{\rm{and}}\quad\omega_2=\frac W2 {\rm e}^{-y}. $
(2) The step function in Eq. (1) serves as an absorption factor, excluding the overlap collisions of nuclei and thereby constraining the results within the UPC framework. It is important to emphasize that the step function represents the approximation of nuclei as hard spheres. To consider the electromagnetic distribution within the nuclei, besides introducing the electromagnetic form factor (as mentioned later), it may also be necessary to account for nuclear breakup, as referenced in [36]. This nuclear breakup can introduce significant corrections in the process of lepton pair production via photon-photon collisions [37, 38], but it is not the primary focus of our work. Moreover,
$ {\boldsymbol{b}}_{1} $ and$ {\boldsymbol{b}}_{2} $ represent the impact parameters. For nucleus, we choose$R_{\rm Pb} = r_0 A_{\rm Pb}^{1/3}$ with$ r_0 = 1.2 $ fm, and the mass number of lead is$A_{\rm Pb}=208$ . In particular,$ N(\omega,{\boldsymbol{b}}) $ is the equivalent photon flux for a given photon energy$ \omega $ and impact parameter b, which can be expressed in terms of the form factor$ F(q^2) $ for the equivalent photon source as follows:$ \begin{aligned}[b]N(\omega, b)=\;&\frac{Z^{2} \alpha_{e m}}{\pi^{2}} \frac{1}{b^{2} \omega} \Bigg[\int u^{2} J_{1}(u) \\&\times F\left(\sqrt{\frac{(b \omega / \gamma_L)^{2}+u^{2}}{b^{2}}}\right) \frac{1}{(b \omega / \gamma_L)^{2}+u^{2}} \ {\rm{d}} u\Bigg]^{2} , \end{aligned} $
(3) where Z is the atomic number of nucleus and
$ \alpha_{e m} $ denotes the fine structure constant.$ \gamma_L $ is the Lorentz factor, which is discussed below.$ J_n(u) $ is the first-kind Bessel function. Form factor is the Fourier transform of charge distribution in the nucleus. If one assumes tha$ \rho(r) $ is the spherical symmetric charge distribution, the form factor is a function of photon virtuality$ q^2 $ [39]:$ F\left(q^2\right)=\int \frac{4 \pi}{q} \rho(r) \sin (q r) r {\rm{d}} r=1-\frac{q^2\langle r^2\rangle}{3 !}+\frac{q^4\langle r^4\rangle}{5 !} \cdots. $
(4) Referring to Refs. [39, 40], the form factor function is given as
$ F(q)=\frac{\Lambda^{2}}{\Lambda^{2}+q^{2}} $
(5) with
$ \Lambda=0.088 $ GeV for nucleus [41−43]. Thus, the equivalent photon flux is written as$ \begin{aligned}[b]N(\omega,{b})=\;&\frac{Z^2 \alpha_{{\rm{em}}}}{\pi^2} \frac{1}{\omega}\Bigg[\frac{\omega}{\gamma_L} K_1\left(b \frac{\omega}{\gamma_L}\right)\\& -\sqrt{\frac{\omega^2}{\gamma_L^2}+\Lambda^2} K_1\left(b \sqrt{\frac{\omega^2}{\gamma_L^2}+\Lambda^2}\right)\Bigg]^2 . \end{aligned} $
(6) where
$ K_1 $ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. Lorentz factor$ \gamma_L $ is computed as$ \gamma_L=\sqrt{s_{NN}}/2m_N $ , where$ m_N $ is the nucleon mass.The cross-section for the
$ \gamma\gamma\to\eta $ process can be calculated using the Low formula, given by [44]$ \hat{\sigma}(\gamma\gamma\to \eta; W^2)=8\pi^2(2J+1)\frac{\Gamma_{\eta\to\gamma\gamma}}{m_\eta}\delta(W^2-m_\eta^2), $
(7) where
$J=0 $ is η's spin, and$ \Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma\gamma} $ is the two-photon decay width of η. Moreover,$ m_\eta $ denotes the mass of the η meson.Based on Eqs. (1)−(7), the total cross-section of the process
${\rm Pb}{\rm Pb}\to {\rm Pb}\otimes\gamma {e}^+{e}^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\otimes{\rm Pb}$ is defined as$ \begin{aligned}[b]&\sigma({\rm Pb}{\rm Pb}\to {\rm Pb}\otimes\gamma {e}^+{e}^-(\mu^+\mu^-)\otimes{\rm Pb}; s) \\ =\;&\sigma\left({\rm PbPb}\to {\rm Pb}\otimes\eta\otimes {\rm Pb}\right)\\& \times {\cal{B}}(\eta\to A^{\prime}\gamma) \times{\cal{B}}(A^{\prime}\to e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)), \end{aligned} $
(8) where s is the square of the center of mass energy of the PbPb system.
$ {\cal{B}}(\eta\to A^{\prime}\gamma) $ and$ {\cal{B}}(A^{\prime}\to e^+e^-(\mu^+\mu^-)) $ denote η decay to dark photons and dark photon decay to electron or muon pair, respectively.We first consider the branching ratios of dark photon decays to lepton pairs, specifically the branching ratios of the
$ A^\prime\to e^+e^- $ or$ A^\prime\to \mu^+\mu^- $ processes. Information on the mass-dependent decay branching ratios of the dark photon below the η meson mass threshold can be found in Ref. [33], indicating that for$ m_{A^\prime}<m_\eta $ , the dark photon mainly decays into the two aforementioned decay channels. We adopt the branching ratio results from [33] and present the branching ratios of the dark photon$ A'$ decaying into the two types of lepton pairs in Fig. 2.Figure 2. (color online) Branching ratios of dark photon decaying into lepton pairs, including electron and muon pair final states. The curves come from Ref. [33].
It is important to emphasize that in this work, we only consider the dark photon decay below the η meson mass threshold. The appearance of decay channels with hadrons as final states leads to a reduction in the branching ratios for lepton pairs, which is beyond the scope of this study. Now, there is one remaining branching ratio related to the dark photon
$ {\cal{B}}(\eta\to A^{\prime}\gamma) $ that needs to be discussed, which is also the largest source of uncertainty in the current analysis. -
The dark photon is the benchmark model for gauge mediators accessible at low energies [18, 45, 46]. The gauge boson
$A' $ mixes with a photon through kinetic mixing and charge coupling [47, 48]. The kinetic mixing term is$ {\cal{L}}_{{\rm{kin}}.{\rm{mix}}.}=-\frac\varepsilon{2\cos\theta_W}{F}_{\mu\nu}^{\prime}{B}^{\mu\nu}, $
(9) where
$ {F}_{\mu\nu}^{\prime}({B}^{\mu\nu}) $ is the U(1)' (hypercharge U(1)Y) field strength tensor and$ \theta_W $ is the weak mixing angle. This will result in a kinetic mixing coupling between the fields of the standard model and the U(1)' field${\cal{L}}_{{\rm{int}}}=-e\varepsilon j_{{\rm{em}}}^\mu{A}_{\mu}^{\prime}$ . As the kinetic mixing parameter$ \varepsilon $ is constrained to be small, these couplings are far weaker than electromagnetism [9, 47−50]. The couplings are suppressed by$ \varepsilon $ . The NA62 collaboration at the CERN SPS has reported the results of the search for η decays to photons and dark photons$A' $ [25], improving the previous constraints on the dark photon mass$ m_{A^\prime} $ and coupling$ \epsilon^2 $ . However, there is currently no viable approach for the precise exploration of the parameter space of dark photons$ (m_{A^\prime},\varepsilon^2) $ .Based on previous studies of the decay mode of η into a classical photon and dark photon, we adopt the branching ratio form from Refs. [27, 29, 51−53]:
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {{\cal{B}}(\eta\to A^{\prime}\gamma)}=\;&{2\varepsilon^2{\cal{B}}(\eta\to\gamma\gamma)\left(1-m_{A^{\prime}}^2/m_\eta^2\right)^3}\\ &{\times\left|\bar{{F}}_{\eta\gamma^*\gamma^*}(m_{A^{\prime}}^2,0)\right|^2, }\end{aligned} $
(10) where
$ {\cal{B}}(\eta\to \gamma\gamma)$ =39.36% denotes the branching ratio of η decay to 2$ \gamma $ [54]. From Refs. [29, 53], the transition form factor$ \bar{F}_{\eta\gamma^*\gamma^*} \simeq 1 $ is used in our analysis.We now find that to calculate the total cross-section in Eq. (8), it is necessary to determine the values of the dark photon's mixing parameters
$ (m_{A^\prime},\varepsilon^2) $ . As mentioned earlier, there is currently no well-established method to tightly constrain these parameters with high precision. Following suggestions from literature reviews [9, 55−59], we limit the dynamical mixing parameter$ \varepsilon $ of the dark photon to$ 10^{-5}< \varepsilon <10^{-4} $ . We acknowledge that the strength of the dark photon coupling is constrained by existing and future experiments, and our results strongly depend on the choice of$ \varepsilon $ .
Estimating the production of dark photons with η decay in high-energy collisions
- Received Date: 2024-06-11
- Available Online: 2024-10-15
Abstract: We propose searching for dark photon signals in the decay channel of η mesons, specifically through the leptonic decay (