A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark

J. H. Field

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103001

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(10) : 103001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103001

A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark

J. H. Field

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The indirect estimation of the Higgs Boson mass from electroweak radiative corrections within the Standard Model is compared with the directly measured value obtained by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations at the CERN LHC collider. Treating the direct measurement of m_H as input, the Standard Model indirect estimation of the top-quark mass is also obtained and compared with its directly measured value. A model-independent analysis finds an indirect value of m_H of ≈ 70 GeV, below the directly measured value of 125.7±0.4 GeV and an indirect value:m_t=177.3±1.0 GeV, above the directly measured value:173.21±0.87 GeV. A goodness-of-fit test to the Standard Model using all Z-pole observables and m_W has a χ² probability of ≈ 2%. The reason why probability values about a factor of ten larger than this, and indirect estimates of m_H about 30 GeV higher, have been obtained in recent global fits to the same data is recalled.
- standard electroweak model ,
- LEP ,
- SLC and LHC data ,
- Z-decays ,
- Higgs boson and top quark masses

References

[1]	Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance, Phys. Rep., 427:257(2006)
[2]	J. Erler and A. Freitas, Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics, p139 in:K. A. Olive et al (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 38:090001(2014)
[3]	ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B, 716:1(2012)
[4]	CMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B, 716:30(2012)
[5]	J. H. Field, Phys. Rev. D, 58:093010(1998)
[6]	J. H. Field, Phys. Rev. D, 61:013010(1999)
[7]	J. H. Field, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 13:1973(1998)
[8]	J. H. Field, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14:1815(1999)
[9]	J. H. Field, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 15:761(2000)
[10]	J. H. Field, Eur. Phys. J. C, 41:427(2005)
[11]	G. Rodrigo, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.), 54A:60(1997)
[12]	W. Awramik et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:201805(2004)
[13]	W. Awramik et al, Phys. Rev. D, 69:053006(2004)
[14]	M. Davier et al, Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1515(2011)
[15]	W. Hollik, Renormalization of the Standard Model, in Precision Tests of the Standard Electroweak Model, Ed. P. Langacker (Singapore:World Scientific, 1995) Fig.2b, p.70
[16]	T. Erler and H. Freitas, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics, in Review of Particle Physics, Chinese Phys. C, 38(9):(2014), Section 10.4.5, p.147
[17]	P. B. Renton, Eur. Phys. J. C, 8:585(1999)
[18]	M. S. Chanowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:231802(2001)
[19]	ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL Collaborations, Phys. Lett. B, 565:61(2003)
[20]	M. Baak et al, arXiv:1407.3792
[21]	M. Ciuchini et al, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement 00(2014) 1-7; arXiv:1410.6940v2
[22]	T. Aziz and A. Gurtu, Precision testing the Standard Model, hep-ph/0110177
[23]	S. Alekhin, J. Blumlein, and S. Moch, Phys. Rev. D, 89:054028(2014)
[24]	G. P. Zeller et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:091802(2002)
[25]	K. S. McFarland et al, arXiv:hep-ex/0205080v2
[26]	M. S. Chanowitz, Phys. Rev. D, 66:072002(2002)
[27]	W. Loinaz et al, Phys. Rev. D, 67:073012(2003)
[28]	W. Loinaz et al, Phys. Rev. D, 70:113004(2004)
[29]	W. T. Eadie et al, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics (North-Hollad, Amsterdam, 1971) Sect. 11.6
[30]	M. Baak et al, Eur. Phys. J C, 72:2205(2012)
[31]	G. Altarelli et al, JHEP, 0106:018(2001)
[32]	G. Altarelli and M. W. Grnewald, Phys. Rep., 403-404:189(2004)
[33]	J. Erler, J. L. Feng, and N. Polonsky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:3063(1997)
[34]	J. Erler and P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:212(2000)
[35]	D. Choudhury, T. M. P. Tait and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D, 65:053002(2002)
[36]	X. G.He and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D, 66:013004, 079901(E) (2002)
[37]	X. G.He and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D, 68:033011(20032)
[38]	J. Cao and J. M. Yang, JHEP, 12:006(2008)

[1]	Zhaoxia Heng , Xue Gong , Haijing Zhou . Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(7): 073103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/7/073103
[2]	Pazilet Obul , Sayipjamal Dulat , Tie-Jiun Hou , Ablikim Tursun , Nijat Yalkun . Next-to-leading order QCD and electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung processes at the LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 093105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/093105
[3]	Bingfang Yang , Huaying Zhang , Biaofeng Hou , Ning Liu . T-odd top partner pair production in the dilepton final states at the LHC in the littlest Higgs Model with T-parity. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 103102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/103102
[4]	Jun-Quan Tao , M. Aamir Shahzad , Si-Jing Zhang , Chu Wang , Yu-Qiao Shen , Guo-Ming Chen , He-Sheng Chen , S. Gascon-Shotkin , M. Lethuillier , L. Finco , C. Camen . Search for a lighter Higgs boson in the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 103107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/103107
[5]	Hong-Lei Li , Peng-Cheng Lu , Zong-Guo Si , Ying Wang . Associated production of Higgs boson and tt at LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(6): 063102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/6/063102
[6]	GUO Xing-Dao , ZHANG Yin-Jie , ZHAO Shu-Min , FENG Tai-Fu , YUAN Xu-Hao , LI Xue-Qian . Top quark forward-backward asymmetry in the little Higgs model. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(11): 113102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/11/113102
[7]	FAN Jia-Wei , TAO Jun-Quan , SHEN Yu-Qiao , CHEN Guo-Ming , CHEN He-Sheng , S. Gascon-Shotkin , M. Lethuillier , L. Sgandurra , P. Soulet . Study of diphoton decays of the lightest scalar Higgs boson in the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 073101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/073101
[8]	TAN Zhi-Guang , ZHENG Hua , HUANG Li-Yuan . Can a Higgs boson be produced at the LHC?. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(5): 395-398. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/5/003
[9]	Bhaghyesh , K. B. Vijaya Kumar , Antony Prakash Monteiro . Heavy quarkonia spectra and their decays in a relativistic quark model. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(11): 997-1003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/11/003
[10]	LI Bing-Zhong , HAN Jin-Zhong . Searching for a neutral top-Higgs in association with top-quark pairs at an e⁺e^- collider in the TC2 model. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(10): 908-913. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/10/004
[11]	XIE Zhen-Xing , FENG Guan-Qiu , GUO Xin-Heng . Radiative leptonic decay B^－_c→τ^－ν_τγ in the standard model and the two-Higgs-doublet model. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(10): 1570-1575. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/004
[12]	ZHANG Zhen-Xia , BIAN Jian-Guo , CHEN Guo-Ming , CHEN Ming-Shui , LI Zu-Hao , LIANG Song , MENG Xiang-Wei , QI Yong-Hui , TANG Zhi-Cheng , TAO Jun-Quan , WANG Jian , WANG Zheng , WANG Xian-You , WANG Jian-Xiong , XIAO Hong , YANG Min , ZANG Jing-Jing , ZHANG Bin , ZHANG Zhen . Study of new boson W^±₁ in the Minimal Higgsless Model at the LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(4): 427-432. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/4/002
[13]	LIU Wei , YUE Chong-Xing , SU Xue-Song , WANG Yong-Zhi . LHT model and Higgs boson production in association with a weak gauge boson at the LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(10): 1565-1569. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/003
[14]	ZHANG Guo-Fang , SONG Jin-Fan , LU Gong-Ru , . Rare decays B⁰_s,d→l⁺l^－ in a top quark two-Higgs-doublet model. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(2): 165-170. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/2/002
[15]	Ding Yibing , Li Xueqian , Wang Jianxiong , Zhang Zhaoxi , Xie Yuehong . On the Observation Effects of Higgs Particle in e⁺e^—→bb Z⁰ and tt－Z⁰ at LEP Ⅱ and NLC. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(11): 982-990.
[16]	ZHANG Zhaoxi , LI Xueqian , YANG Maozhi , WANG Jianxiong . The Study on the Production of tc at LEPⅡ Energy in the Extended Standard Model with Two Higgs-doublets. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(12): 1081-1090.
[17]	BAO Shu-Qing , XUE Xiao-Zhou . Constraints to Grand Unified Preon Models from Recent Lep data. Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(5): 405-413.
[18]	YE Jing-Bo , XU Zi-Zong , CHEN Hong-Fang , MA Wen-Gan , ZHANG Zi-Ping . ERROR DISCUSSION OF LEP/L3 LUMINOSITY MEASUREMENT. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(3): 207-211.
[19]	YE Jing-Bo , MA Wen-Gan , ZHANG Zi-Ping , XU Zi-Zong , DAI Qing-Hai . CALCULATION AND EVENTS GENERATION OF Bhabha SCATTERING AT LEP/SLC ENERGY. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(9): 772-780.
[20]	Ye Jingbo , Ma Wengan , Zhang Ziping , Xu Zizong , Dai Qinghai . Calculation and Event Generation of Bhabha Scattering at LEP/SLC Energy. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S3): 221-230.

Access

Get Citation

J. H. Field. A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 103001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103001

J. H. Field. A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 103001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103001 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-05-11

Article Metric

Article Views(1753)
PDF Downloads(19)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

A comparison of direct and indirect determinations of the masses of the Higgs Boson and the top quark

HTML

目录