×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系,借此进行欺诈等不法行为,请广大作者加以鉴别,如遇诈骗行为,请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认(《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部电话:010-88235947,010-88236950),并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明:
(1)本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
(2)本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径,该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统,仅在本刊投稿网网址(https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc)设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿,如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等,若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
(3)所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表,本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿,并收取发表费用,均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部
2024年10月30日

QCD equation of state for heavy ion collisions

  • In this work, we calculate the equation of state (EoS) of quark gluon-plasma (QGP) using the Cornwall-Jackiw-Tomboulis (CJT) effective action. We get the quark propagator by using the rank-1 separable model within the framework of the Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSEs). The results from CJT effective action are compared with lattice QCD data. We find that, when μ is small, our results generally fit the lattice QCD data when T>Tc, but show deviations at and below Tc. It can be concluded that the EoS of CJT is reliable when T>Tc. Then, by adopting the hydrodynamic code UVH2+1, we compare the CJT results of the multiplicity and elliptic flow v2 with the PHENIX data and the results from the original EoS in UVH2+1. While the CJT results of multiplicities generally match the original UVH2+1 results and fit the experimental data, the CJT results of v2 are slightly larger than the original UVH2+1 results for centralities smaller than 40% and smaller than the original UVH2+1 results for higher centralities.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] P.Braun-Munzinger and J. Wambach, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81:1031-1050(2009)
    [2] J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw, and E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D, 10:2428(1974)
    [3] K. Stam, Phys. Lett. B, 152:238(1985)
    [4] C. D. Roberts, Sebastian, and M. Schmidt, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45:s1(2000)
    [5] Y. Hatta and T. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. D, 67:014028(2003)
    [6] C. Shi, Y. L. Wang, Y. Jiang, Z.F. Cui, and H. S. Zong, JHEP 07:014(2014)
    [7] D. Blaschke, G. Burau, Yu. L. Kalinovsky, P. Maris, and P. C. Tandy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 16:2267(2001)
    [8] M. He, J. F. Li, W. M. Sun, and H. S. Zong, Phys. Rev. D, 79:036001(2009)
    [9] A.M. Zhao, Z. F. Cui, Y. Jiang, and H. S. Zong, Phys. Rev. D, 90:114031(2014)
    [10] R. Baier, P. Romatschke, and U. A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. C, 73:064903(2006)
    [11] R. Baier and P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C, 51:677(2007)
    [12] P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C, 52:203(2007)
    [13] P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:172301(2007)
    [14] H. S. Zong and W. M. Sun, Phys. Rev. D, 78:054001(2008)
    [15] C. J. Burden, L. Qian, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, and M. J. Thomson, Phys. Rev. C, 55:2649(1997)
    [16] G. F. Burgio, H. Chen, H.-J. Schulze, and G. Taranto, PoS Confinement X, 255(2013)
    [17] J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton, Phys. Rev. C, 73:034905(2006)
    [18] S. Borsanyi et al, JHEP, 1009:073(2010)
    [19] Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B, 568:73-77(2003)
    [20] J. Letessier and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. C, 67:031902(2003)
    [21] C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D, 68:014507(2003)
    [22] The PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C, 69:034909(2004)
    [23] The PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C, 80:024909(2009)
    [24] M. Laine and Y. Schroder, Phys. Rev. D, 73:085009(2006)
  • 加载中

Get Citation
A-Meng Zhao, Yuan-Mei Shi, Jian-Feng Li and Hong-Shi Zong. QCD equation of state for heavy ion collisions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 103101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103101
A-Meng Zhao, Yuan-Mei Shi, Jian-Feng Li and Hong-Shi Zong. QCD equation of state for heavy ion collisions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 103101.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/103101 shu
Milestone
Received: 2017-01-19
Revised: 2017-06-16
Fund

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11447121, 11475085, 11535005, 11690030), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (020414380074), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1501035B) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130078, BK20130387)

Article Metric

Article Views(1794)
PDF Downloads(14)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

QCD equation of state for heavy ion collisions

    Corresponding author: A-Meng Zhao,
    Corresponding author: Hong-Shi Zong,
  • 1.  Department of Foundation, Southeast University Chengxian College, Nanjing 210088, China
  • 2. Department of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China
  • 3. Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 4. College of Mathematics and Physics, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
  • 5. Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 6. Joint Center for Particle, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 7. State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, CAS, Beijing 100190, China
Fund Project:  Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11447121, 11475085, 11535005, 11690030), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (020414380074), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1501035B) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130078, BK20130387)

Abstract: In this work, we calculate the equation of state (EoS) of quark gluon-plasma (QGP) using the Cornwall-Jackiw-Tomboulis (CJT) effective action. We get the quark propagator by using the rank-1 separable model within the framework of the Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSEs). The results from CJT effective action are compared with lattice QCD data. We find that, when μ is small, our results generally fit the lattice QCD data when T>Tc, but show deviations at and below Tc. It can be concluded that the EoS of CJT is reliable when T>Tc. Then, by adopting the hydrodynamic code UVH2+1, we compare the CJT results of the multiplicity and elliptic flow v2 with the PHENIX data and the results from the original EoS in UVH2+1. While the CJT results of multiplicities generally match the original UVH2+1 results and fit the experimental data, the CJT results of v2 are slightly larger than the original UVH2+1 results for centralities smaller than 40% and smaller than the original UVH2+1 results for higher centralities.

    HTML

Reference (24)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return